Tag Archives: Prepping

Think You’re Prepared For The Next Crisis? Think Again. By Adam Taggart

No matter how much you’re prepped, there’s something out there you haven’t prepped for. From Adam Taggart at peakprosperity.com:

No plan of operations extends with any certainty beyond the first contact with the main hostile force.

~ Helmuth von Moltke the Elder

Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.

~ Mike Tyson

Scottish poet Robert Burns aptly penned the famous phrase: “The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men/Gang aft a-gley.” (commonly adapted as “The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry.”)

How right he was.

History has shown time and time again that the only 100% predictable outcome to any given strategy is that, when implemented, things will not go 100% according to plan.

Continue reading

Martha Stewart Will Definitely Survive the Zombie Apocalypse, by Daisy Luther

Martha Stewart may be the ultimate prepper. This is an interesting article about a fascinating woman. From Daisy Luther at theorganicprepper.com:

I have always been a big fan of Martha Stewart.  I know, sometimes she does stuff like gluing moss on lampshades which causes you to wonder if she ever uses that lamp and why it doesn’t catch fire, and rolling grapes in goose liver pate sounds like it won’t be on my bucket list, but let’s put those things aside for a moment and talk about how Martha is better prepared than just about anyone to survive the Zombie Apocalypse. And it’s not just because she’s rich.

Please note that, as always, I use the Zombie Apocalypse as a metaphor for any type of civil unrest, long-term disaster in which the unprepared are going to want what you’ve carefully stored, and events during which people eagerly await the government’s handouts to rescue them from their Darwinian fates.

But, let’s talk about Martha. I’ve always seen her as a mentor, even though I’ve never had the privilege of meeting her.

She understands the value of a home-cooked meal with every detail from scratch. She grows her own veggies and herbs, maintains orchards, and raises chickens. She can sew, bake, garden, and run a multi-billion dollar business. She’s survived some things that would have driven a lesser woman to her knees. Remember how a few weeks back when I talked about prepper friends, I said that some of them weren’t exactly preppers but would be fantastic neighbors and allies? One word for you: MARTHA.

Here are just a few of the reasons why I’m quite certain that Martha Stewart will survive anything the Zombie Apocalypse could throw at her.

She can cook anything, anywhere.

First of all, let me state that Martha Stewart taught me to cook. When I was a new bride, I seriously couldn’t cook at all except for homemade tomato soup and homemade marinara sauce. Anything beyond that was beyond my ability because I’d spent my single young adulthood traveling around, staying in extra rooms, and renting hotels by the week while I explored America and Canada.

To continue reading: Martha Stewart Will Definitely Survive the Zombie Apocalypse

 

Forbes Says Self-Reliant Homesteaders Are “Delusional” and “Mooching” Off “Civil Society”, by Daisy Luther

A Forbes writer whose only apparent contact with homesteaders is the ones he’s seen on reality TV nevertheless disparages the entire group. From Daisy Luther at theorganicprepper.ca:

It’s always interesting reading when someone smug and sanctimonious writes a clueless diatribe about another group of people being smug and sanctimonious. So when I saw that an economist for Moody’s and Forbes had written an op-ed calling self-reliant homesteaders “delusional,” I knew I’d be in for some misinformed hilarity.

The article, entitled, “Dear Homesteaders, Self-Reliance Is a Delusion” was published a couple of days ago on the Forbes website. You’ll be forewarned that the article won’t be deep in the first paragraph, when the author presents his claim to knowledge about self-reliant living comes from the fact that he is “a big fan of shows about doomsday preppers, homesteaders, survivalists, generally people who live off the grid.”

And the well-informed opinion of this arbiter of self-reliance?

…there’s a central delusion in these shows that is never far from my mind when I’m watching these shows: off the grid people are not self-reliant, but instead are mooching off of the civil society, government, and safety net the rest of us contribute to…

The people in these shows often describe a very romantic vision of the lives they have chosen the ethos underlying it. They describe themselves as fully self-reliant, and criticize the rest of society as being dependent and lacking in this self-reliance. It is morally superior, the story goes, to provide for yourself, take care of your own needs, and often, be prepared to survive if society collapses.

First, let me segue a little bit and tell you about the author. According to his bio on Economy.com:

Adam Ozimek is an associate director and senior economist in the West Chester office of Moody’s Analytics. Adam covers state and regional economies, as well U.S. labor markets and demographics. Prior to joining Moody’s Analytics, Adam was Senior Economist and Director of Research for Econsult Solutions, an economics consulting company. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Temple University and his bachelor’s degree in economics from West Chester University.

So based on this, I’m going to guess that homesteading and off-grid living aren’t his jam. I mean, he might head down to the Westtown Amish Market there in Pennsylvania, but I’d be willing to place money on that being his closest brush with any real, live, self-reliant homesteaders.

To continue reading: Forbes Says Self-Reliant Homesteaders Are “Delusional” and “Mooching” Off “Civil Society”

Stay Away From Crowds, by Ol’ Remus

In a survival scenario, any kind of crowd that has something the government wants, like food, will be at risk. From Ol’ Remus at woodpile report.com, via theburningplatform.com:

There was a war in the mid-1600s you’ve never heard of, ending in the near-extermination of the Erie by the Iroquois and others. Captives were sold into slavery and thus disbursed from the Cherokees in the Carolinas to the Senecas in Canada. All that remains of the Erie are place names—a lake, a city, a canal and so forth—and fugitive traces for linguists and historians to puzzle out. This is common. This is the way of the world. We’re all made from fragments of such disasters.

History whispers its horrors plainly if we properly understand it. There are no victories without defeat, and defeat goes deeper than victory. Julius Caesar sometimes commented on this in his dispatches from the Gallic Wars. Our own time has had Mao, Pol Pot, Himmler, Beria and a long list of others who, unlike Caesar, were not warrior-builders so much as agents of annihilation, our darkest fear.

The signature event of survivalists is bugging out on Doomsday Morn, the harrowing dash to their fortified bolt hole as society collapses in a fiery heap behind them. For preppers it’s the remote homestead with gardens and solar panels, a comfy redoubt to weather the storm with grace and style. Either may be part of a militia, bands of brothers training to defend their own in Mad Max times. All are responding to a partial, almost optimistic understanding of the coming disaster.

DC has plainly stated, in public documents, they will requisition food, transportation, equipment, supplies and involuntarily servitude of any kind, in any amount, to whatever extent that pleases them in a “national emergency”. Their control of the cities would rest on food distribution and essential services, then as now, and the rest of America would be stripped to make it happen. This is, plainly said, calculated annihilation, held as not only necessary but just.

DC considers their power base—the urban west and east coasts and a few colonies in between—to be the real America, supported unwillingly but rightly by deplorables living elsewhere who would otherwise act solely from pathologies born of willful ignorance and native ill will. In other times and places “deplorables” were the “untermensch” or the “masses”, always seen as a dangerous, undifferentiated hive, uneducable but trainable, to be cowed and dazzled by turns, and in extremis better mourned than saved.

To continue reading: Stay Away From Crowds

Empty Shelves and Madness: A Minor Winter Storm Drove People Into “Panic Buying of Food And Basics”, by Mac Slavo

If you are not stocked with basic provisions, at a bare minimum enough to last at a week, you will be at the mercy of the government and your fellow citizens should disaster strike. From Mac Slavo at shtfplan.com:

A couple of weeks ago, in early January, there was a relatively minor storm in the South and Southeast U.S. Cold weather, threat of the power going out, snow and ice and empty store shelves.

This wasn’t the big one. And yet it was enough to bring things to a panic.

If this is how people react to an extreme cold spell, then what happens when something major hits?

With about two months of winter to go, it is the kind of routine disturbance that is likely to happen again without much ado. A much more severe storm may come as well.

Shortages, and ill prepared people scrambling about for the final available resources. The angry race to the checkout line probably elicited road rage, fights and arguments… the storm that is brought out in people poses perhaps an even larger threat than the natural disaster, etc. itself.

After a few short hours ahead of a short-lived bitter cold, practically everything was gone – and nothing even happened yet. None one had gone without, and things hadn’t even gotten the chance to turn ugly.

If this had been a true crisis, and not just extreme weather over the weekend, people would have killed and died over a cart of groceries, some bottles of water or some fuel… and they could have prepared instead.

Vic Bishop shared these photos via Waking Times.com that were sent by a Walmart employee in a North Carolina store. He witnessed a chaotic buying spree, hopeless long lines and a people who could be brought to their knees within mere hours, and without even facing a real threat:

As a wave of extremely cold temperatures and isolated winter storms hits the South and Southeastern parts of the United States, Americans are once again proving their tendency to panic buy food and basic provisions in the event of even the most predictable and short-term emergencies.

To continue reading: Empty Shelves and Madness: A Minor Winter Storm Drove People Into “Panic Buying of Food And Basics”

 

Beyond Jenga, by Robert Gore

Built as they are on flawed philosophical and intellectual foundations, current political and economic arrangements may prove remarkably tenuous, upended by random, seemingly trivial perturbations, which SLL has analogized to a crashing Jenga tower. (“Orwell or Jenga?” 10/13/15). While those who are currently in power clearly desire increasing centralization, supranationality, and state control, those desires are running smack into the centrifugal forces engendered by modern technologies and markets, and the obvious incompetence and corruption endemic in present state structures.

There is no shortage of material on preparing for outcomes running the gamut from Orwellian police states to anarchy. If for no other reasons than that the world is embarking on the biggest debt contraction (after the biggest debt expansion) in history, most governments are essentially bankrupt, and police states are an expensive proposition, a probability distribution of possibilities skews toward disorder and the more anarchic outcomes.

“Orwell or Jenga” suggested that current financial arrangements based on fiat currencies and debt could well be a source of Jenga instability. SLL maintains that such currencies and debt are not money (“Real Money,” 9/9/15), because they are liabilities of either governments or central banks and have no intrinsic value. Precious metals, on the other hand, are not liabilities and have intrinsic value. They have been money in the past and it’s possible they will be so again, both during an anarchic phase that it is to be hoped will be transitory, and later as new political and economic arrangements emerge.

When prices were close to their recent lows, SLL suggested that it was a good time to buy gold and silver. (“Buy Gold and Silver,” 7/20/15). Prices have rallied somewhat, but your perspective should be your ability to exchange precious metals for goods and services, not “value” as measured in fiat debt units. You buy gold and silver for the same reasons you stockpile essentials and keep your firearms and shooting skills in good working order: as reasonable preparations for a future that may be far different than today.

However, obtaining precious metals raises a number of issues. SLL has discussed buying them, but has said nothing about the mechanics of doing so. Although the SLL website carries various online advertisements, it does not endorse specific businesses. (It has yet to come up, but SLL would not hesitate to criticize an advertiser, or carry a guest post that did so, even if it meant the loss of that advertiser’s business) While no dealer will be recommended, here are some guidelines for buying precious metals.

Precious metals can be purchased online or at physical stores. There is something to be said for developing a relationship with a local dealer. Go with recommendations from people you trust, but whether you have a referral or you’re trying to evaluate a dealer cold, there are a few reliable benchmarks. The longer the dealer has been in business, the higher the probability it is reputable. Check online reviews. Compare dealer prices against both the premium to spot metal prices and “live” prices for the same items posted by Internet dealers. If you have a smart phone you can do it in real time. One trick to keep dealers honest is to ask for both bid and ask quotes, without indicating whether you are buying or selling. Compare bid-asked spreads to those on the internet. If they’re wide or the dealer won’t give you a two-way quote, find another dealer.

It is difficult to buy precious metals from a reputable dealer without generating a paper or computer-stored record. Assume any Internet transaction will generate a record, but cash transactions at a store probably will as well. Dealers are subject to the Patriot Act’s anti-money laundering rules. They also have to report cash receipts in excess of $10,000, which is not a large transaction for precious metals (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/faq060305.html). If you make a series of sub-$10,000 transactions, the dealer may have to file a Suspicious Activity Report. Assume most dealers will want at least your name and address for even small cash transactions, if only to protect themselves if they’re audited by the government. For those worried about government access to your purchase records and a repeat of President Roosevelt’s 1933 confiscation of gold, there is reason to worry. However, there doesn’t seem to be legal ways around the problem if you are buying gold or silver from a dealer. SLL welcomes knowledgable information on this issue in the comments section.

There are a number of reputable online precious metals dealers. Check and compare online reviews and Better Business Bureau complaints, the time dealers have been in business, posted prices and premiums, bid-ask spreads, selection of products, shipping rates, volume discounts, and online and phone customer service policies. Many dealers offer to store your metals (some offer storage in foreign depositories) and guarantee that they will be segregated, identified as yours, and delivered on demand. This solves the security issue of keeping metals safe at home or a business, or the risk of keeping them in a bank safety deposit box, where they may be subject to government seizure.

However, since the focus here is on Jenga-style upheaval where gold and silver become a medium of exchange, what good will yours do you if it is in a depository, especially if it is in a foreign country? Don’t think a depository outside the country will protect your metals from confiscation; the long arm of the US government reaches around the world. With access to purchase records, it may force you to bring your stash back to this country and cough it up.

If gold and silver are mediums of exchange, you want your immediately available reserve in small units. Who’s going to make change for a 100 ounce silver bar or a one ounce gold ingot or coin? There is no reason to pay the premium for gold and silver coins over ingots if ingots are available in the same weights as coins. You may want to keep the bulk of your precious metals in a depository as a store of wealth, but have a sufficient number of smaller units at home in a secure place in case of sudden apocalypse. Smaller units are also less likely to be confiscated.

However, do not convert all your financial assets to precious metals. There is the confiscation danger, and if things get really bad, their exchange value against scarce day-to-day necessities like food, water, medicine, fuel, and the like may be low. Make sure you have an adequate stockpile of essentials before you spend much on precious metals. A hunk of metal will not sustain life, and items you can barter from your stockpile may have far more exchange value than precious metals. A carton of toilet paper may command more than a ounce of silver. Your precious metals should not be ends in themselves, just components of a well-devised and diversified plan for a risky, uncertain future.

LITERARY GOLD

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK