Tag Archives: US Treasury

And Again: The Fed Monetizes $4.1 Billion In Debt Sold Just Days Earlier, by Tyler Durden

If the Fed buys a new Treasury issue directly from the Treasury it is considered monetizing the debt, which is against the law. However, if the Fed buys a new Treasury issue from a dealer bank a day after the dealer bank bought it from the Treasury, that’s legal, although the practical effect is the same: the debt has been monetized. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Over the past week, when looking at the details of the Fed’s ongoing QE4, we showed out (here and here) that the New York Fed was now actively purchasing T-Bills that had been issued just days earlier by the US Treasury. As a reminder, the Fed is prohibited from directly purchasing Treasurys at auction, as that is considered “monetization” and directly funding the US deficit, not to mention is tantamount to “Helicopter Money” and is frowned upon by Congress and established economists. However, insert a brief, 3-days interval between issuance and purchase… and suddenly nobody minds. As we summarized:

“for those saying the US may soon unleash helicopter money, and/or MMT, we have some ‘news’: helicopter money is already here, and the Fed is now actively monetizing debt the Treasury sold just days earlier using Dealers as a conduit… a “conduit” which is generously rewarded by the Fed’s market desk with its marked up purchase price. In other words, the Fed is already conducting Helicopter Money (and MMT) in all but name. As shown above, the Fed monetized T-Bills that were issued just three days earlier – and just because it is circumventing the one hurdle that prevents it from directly purchasing securities sold outright by the Treasury, the Fed is providing the Dealers that made this legal debt circle-jerk possible with millions in profits, even as the outcome is identical if merely offset by a few days”

So, predictably, fast forward to today when the Fed conducted its latest T-Bill POMO in which, as has been the case since early October, the NY Fed’s market desk purchased the maximum allowed in Bills, some $7.5 billion, out of $25.3 billion in submissions. What was more notable were the actual CUSIPs that were accepted by the Fed for purchase. And here, once again, we find just one particular issue that stuck out: TY5 (due Dec 31, 2020) which was the most active CUSIP, with $4.136BN purchased by the Fed, and TU3 (due Dec 3, 2020) of which $905MM was accepted.

Continue reading→

 

Treasury Admits It Lost $1.2 TRILLION in 2017, by Mark Nestmann

The US is broke, and the Treasury’s own report admits it. From Mark Nestmann at nestmann.com:

In 1971, President Richard Nixon told an ABC News reporter that he was “now a Keynesian in economics.”

Nixon’s statement was an acknowledgment that he agreed with the ideas of John Maynard Keynes. Keynes was an economist whose theories once underpinned the economies of every major country.

Nixon’s endorsement of Keynesian economics was shocking. To understand its impact at the time, consider how the world would react today if the leader of ISIS converted to Christianity. Or if the National Rifle Association endorsed a ban on semi-automatic weapons.

Nixon’s statement was astonishing because one of the fundamental precepts of Keynesian economics is that governments must intervene in the economy to ensure “optimal outcomes.” To economic conservatives, this was dangerously close to socialism or even communism.

Keynes believed that business cycles – periods of expansion followed by recessions – are the inevitable consequence of capitalism. Free-market economists believe governments should not intervene in the business cycle support economies in recession. Keynes thought intervention was a fundamental duty of government.

During the Great Depression of the 1930s, Keynes advocated for governments to reduce taxes and increase public spending to spur employment. Keynes acknowledged that this policy might require deficit spending. But he believed budget surpluses when prosperity returned would make up for the deficits.

Once Nixon embraced Keynesianism, resistance by economic conservatives – and the Republican Party – faltered. The last Republican president who didn’t endorse Keynesian economics was Dwight Eisenhower, who left office in 1961. Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., George Bush Jr., and now Donald Trump have all embraced cutting taxes to spur the economy.

That brings us to 2018. February 15, 2018, to be exact. That’s the day that Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin signed off on a report with the mind-numbing title Fiscal Year 2017 Financial Report of the United States Government.

To continue reading: Treasury Admits It Lost $1.2 TRILLION in 2017

U.S. Treasury Lets Private Pensions Slash Benefits for the First Time In History, from Birch Gold Group

The US Treasury has now allowed a private pension fund to slash the benefits it had agreed to provide. The Treasury has little choice; it’s that or bankruptcy for underfunded private pensions. From Birch Gold Group via theburningplatform.com:

Public pensions are falling apart around the country, but now the security of private pensions is being threatened as well. Based on a new Federal law passed in 2014, the U.S. Department of the Treasury just made a shocking decision to allow a Cleveland-based ironworker pension to start slashing member benefits as early as next month. Now, experts fear other struggling private pensions could quickly follow.

Opening Pandora’s Box on Pensions

It’s always been assumed that both public and private pensions will find a way to fix their shortfalls and pay out their obligated benefits – with public pensions using government cash (from budget cuts and tax hikes), and private pensions relying on corporate profits and cash reserves.

But today’s economy is making those old pension safety nets unfeasible; governments are running out of money, and private sector performance is plummeting.

Now, pensions are starting to consider just how obligated they really are.

Public pensions started bending the rules first, which is less surprising since lawmakers have a personal interest in legislating away plan obligations to avoid gutting government budgets. Private pensions don’t have the same “power behind the throne,” though. They’re legally bound by federal law to pay out their guaranteed benefits.

Well, at least they were legally bound until 2014, when the law changed to allow private pensions to cut benefits upon approval of the Treasury Department.

Now, two years later, the Treasury Department is approving the first request for approval, and critics believe it could trigger a domino effect that strips millions of private pension members of their benefits.

To continue reading: U.S. Treasury Lets Private Pensions Slash Benefits for the First Time In History