Tag Archives: Anthony Fauci

Fauci Should Be Prosecuted for Negligent Homicide for Vaccine Lies, by Ben Bartee

It’s pretty straightforward, actually. You knowingly lie about the safety of a vaccine that is not safe, people believe you, they take the vaccine, and they die. That could certainly make out a case of negligent homicide. From Ben Bartee at thedailybell.com:

I recently proposed that COVID Warlord Fauci can and should be prosecuted for negligent homicide vis a vis the illicit gain-of-function research he funded in Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Here, I would like to expand the indictment to include his vaxx-related criminality, which is legion.

On the vaxx front, Fauci is culpable for an untold number of deaths which will become, perhaps, more concrete over time as the research unfolds into what exactly the long-term effects of the gene therapy are.

As of March 2023, there are 19,476 preliminary reports of death from the COVID-19 shots reported to the CDC’s and FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

However – and this is a huge caveat – the figures reflected in VAERS are likely significant under-estimates of the actual death toll. Research indicates that less than 1% of adverse events are ever actually reported to VAERS.

Via Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, in a report submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS):

“Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

What this means is that, potentially, upwards of 2,000,000 deaths in the US alone may be attributable, in the final analysis, to the COVID shots. That’s 2,000,000 potential cases of negligent homicide, laid at the feet of Anthony Fauci, among others.

Continue reading

Fauci confesses that Covid vaccines could never have worked as claimed, by HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team)

You may want to sit down. It’s a shocker, but Saint Anthony Fauci may have lied, or at least misspoke. From HART at hartgroup.org:

Facts previously dismissed as misinformation now admitted

On 11 January 2023 a paper was published in Cell Host & Microbe titled “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses”.

There are just 3 authors, one of whom is Anthony Fauci, who served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022, and the chief medical advisor to the President from 2021 to 2022.

Fauci is generally regarded as one of the key architects of the USA’s – and therefore the world’s – response to the pandemic, including pushing for the emergency authorisation and rollout of the Covid vaccines, and the formulation of policies which exerted huge pressure on citizens in nearly all countries to be injected with these products or else face sanctions, ranging from social ostracisation via the use of “vaccine passport” schemes, through to job losses, and even fines merely for being unvaccinated.

Fauci made some bold claims about the Covid vaccines in order to justify such coercive policies, including that they would prevent infections and limit transmission of the virus to others. These claims were then picked up by political leaders worldwide and used to justify their own policies, even when – from early data – it became obvious that the vaccines did not prevent infections or reduce the viral load of those infected.

This latest article, therefore, has quite rightly raised some eyebrows because of the astonishing concessions it contains, amongst which are the following:

  1. Of the influenza vaccines, the authors note:

    As of 2022, after more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted. As pointed out decades ago, and still true today, the rates of effectiveness of our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.

    The authors then draw parallels between the vaccines for covid and those for influenza:

    The vaccines for these two very different viruses [covid19 and influenza] have common characteristics: they elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity.

Continue reading

What Fauci Knew About Vaccine Ineffectiveness… And When, by Jeffrey A. Tucker

To call Anthony Fauci a snake is to malign snakes. From Jeffrey A. Tucker at The Epoch Times via zerohedge.com:

What if Anthony Fauci co-authored an article on vaccines that would have gotten you and I blocked and banned at any point in the last three years?

That just happened.

His article in Cell – “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses” – says it as plainly as possible: the COVID vaccine did not work because it could not work.

Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in an illustration image. (Shutterstock)

First some review from what we knew before this whole fiasco began.

Vaccines are not suitable for coronaviruses. Such respiratory viruses spread and mutate too quickly. This is why there has never been a vaccine for the common cold and why the flu shot is predictably suboptimal. Vaccines can only be sterilizing and contribute to public health when the virus is a stable pathogen like Smallpox and Measles. For coronaviruses, there is really only one way forward: better anti-virals, therapeutics, and acquired immunity.

The above paragraph has been repeated to me countless times in my life, especially after COVID hit. Every expert was on the same page. There was simply no question about it. Anything that would be called a vaccine would lack the features of vaccines past. It would not stop infection or transmission, much less end a bad season for respiratory viruses. This is why the FDA has never approved one. It would not and could not make it through trials, especially given the safety risks associated with every vaccine.

Maybe, maybe, there exists the possibility that you can come up with one variant but it is not likely to be approved in time to be effective. It might provide temporary protection against severe outcomes from one variant but it will be useless against further mutations. In addition, vaccine-induced protection is not as broad as natural immunity, so it is likely that the person would get infected later. Boosting is likely only to pertain to last month’s mutation, and raises dangers of itself: imprinting the immune system in ways that make it less effective.

Continue reading→

Fauci Knew Boosters Could Cause Immune Tolerance; Pushed for them Anyway, by Igor Chudov

What happens when “The Science,” Anthony Fauci, contradicts “The Science,” Anthony Fauci? From Igor Chudov at igorchudov.substack.com:

Did “the science” have our best interests at heart?

SUMMARY: This post presents evidence proving that Tony Fauci and immunologists knew that mRNA Covid boosters could cause disease-enabling immune tolerance. Despite that documented knowledge, they inexplicably pushed to boost people repeatedly, ruining their immunity to Sars-Cov-2.

At the Speed of Science

The anti-Covid-vaccine circles are abuzz with posts discussing “IgG4 immune tolerance”. It describes mRNA-injected people developing so-called “IgG4 antibodies”, which make their immune systems “ignore” Covid infections instead of fighting them vigorously, leading to slow virus clearance, excessive replication of the virus, and “sudden deaths.”

Continue reading→

7 Facts Fauci Knew But Hid From the Public, by James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D.

In a world with even a semblance of justice, the headline’s 7 facts would be incorporated into an indictment against Fauci. From James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., at childrenshealthdefense.org:

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) this week listed seven key facts about the COVID-19 pandemic and the government’s response to it that, according to Jordan, Dr. Anthony Fauci knew but didn’t tell the public.

Editor’s note: House Republicans on Monday commissioned a special investigative panel focused on the coronavirus pandemic during which they hope to press scientists and federal officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, about the origin of the public health crisis and the government’s response to it.

The following is a paraphrase of the opening round — the warning shot — by U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) Tuesday in which he used his time to outline seven facts that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew, and, more importantly, what Fauci did, and did not do, when he was made aware of these facts.

This does not bode well for Fauci and those involved in the cover-up.

  1. Fauci understood that American tax dollars went to EcoHealth Alliance and that money was then funneled to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) lab in China.
  2. Fauci knew EcoHealth Alliance was given an exemption from the pause on gain-of-function research.
  3. Fauci knew that the security standards at the WIV lab in China were deficient.

Continue reading→

The Coming Grand Jury Indictments of 2023 and Beyond, by Dr. Joseph Sansome

There is no assurance of grand jury indictments for the criminals of the last three years, but at least the prospect can no longer be dismissed out of hand as wishful thinking. From Dr. Joseph Sansome at josephsansome.substack.com:

Elon Musk continues to release incriminating files from Twitter that shows criminal activity. Censoring citizens regarding Covid, Ukraine, and Covid 19 bioweapons, all at the behest of the government. Covering up sensitive political information regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop, and certainly, anything to do with fraudulent elections.

Recently, Elon Musk called out gain of function research, promoted by  Anthony Fauci, as a bioweapon. Musk is correct. Gain of function research is bioweapon development. Dr. Francis Boyle, an international and criminal law expert, has been pointing out for quite some time that Fauci and others are criminally implicated in the development of an offensive biological weapon in a scientific paper entitled,  A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence, published in 2015. Dr. Boyle, is also author of the 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act, and in his book,  Resisting Medical Tyranny, lays out a legal strategy of bypassing corrupt federal courts and seeking indictments in state courts. Statewide grand juries, utilizing state attorney generals, as well as grand juries utilizing state attorneys, and even county prosecutors where applicable, are part of this strategy. Indictments for murder and conspiracy to commit murder can be sought. Dr. Boyle asserts that once the first indictment comes in the house of cards will fall. This is also mentioned in my open letter to Attorney General Ashley Moody.

Continue reading→

Elon Musk Announces New Twitter Science Policy, Blasts Dr. Anthony Fauci: ‘Cannot Be Regarded As A Scientist’, by Daily Wire News

Elon Musk wants science to get thrashed out on Twitter, as science has been thrashed out for centuries. From the Daily Wire News at dailywire.com:

Elon Musk arrives for the 2022 Met Gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 2, 2022, in New York.
ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images

Twitter CEO Elon Musk announced Wednesday that the social media company’s new official policy will not penalize users for legitimately questioning scientific claims and narratives that are promoted in the media.

The statement from Musk comes as he has taken multiple shots at leftists this week for buying into mainstream media narratives.

“New Twitter policy is to follow the science, which necessarily includes reasoned questioning of the science,” Musk said.

In a subsequent tweet, Musk responded to professor Gad Saad, who posted a video mocking Dr. Anthony Fauci and his decision to retire as Republicans are set to take over the House of Representatives next week.

“Anyone who says that questioning them is questioning science itself cannot be regarded as a scientist,” Musk said in response to the video about Fauci.

Continue reading→

Post-Faucist America, by Lloyd Billingsley

Fauci will be as hard to get rid of as the sidewalk gum on which you stepped. From Lloyd Billingsley at amgreatness.com:

Without crucial reforms, the NIAID boss Anthony Fauci will be neither gone nor forgotten.

Seeking exceptional candidates: NIH posts job ad to replace Fauci,” headlined a November 23 Helio report, which asked “experts” what qualities they would like to see in the person who replaces Dr. Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984. 

One of the experts was Dr. Peter Hotez, professor of pediatrics and molecular virology at Baylor College of Medicine. Hotez earned a degree in molecular biophysics from Yale, a doctorate in biochemistry from Rockefeller University, and an MD from Weill Cornell Medical College. 

Cornell is where Anthony Fauci got his MD, and the professor is a huge fan.

“Replacing Dr. Fauci after so many decades will be daunting,” Dr. Hotez explained, “not only because Tony was a superb administrator and scientist, but also because he helped the U.S. Congress and executive branch understand the importance of infectious disease research to national and global security. Dr. Fauci’s replacement must not only be an important American scientist but also an adept science explainer, convener, and advocate.” 

Dr. Fauci is also “a punching bag for the far right since the earliest days of the outbreak,” contended Dr. Hotez in “The Unique Terror of Being a Covid Scientist After January 6.” That June 21, 2021, Daily Beast commentary was subtitled “It’s no coincidence that one of the first guilty pleas in connection with the Capitol riot was of an anti-vaxxer.” 

Hotez charges that in 2020 “the Trump White House embarked on a deliberate antiscience disinformation campaign.” The “far-right fringe” mounted “attacks” on Fauci and Dr. Peter Daszak who heads the EcoHealth Alliance.

“I agree with Dr. Fauci when he says that these personal attacks represent an assault on American science,” Hotez argued, but there was more to it. “Ultimately, the far-right hunt for biomedical scientists represents an essential element for totalitarian control that goes back almost 100 years. In this context courage and standing up for democratic values demands that the American people throw their full support behind scientists and scientific institutions. To do otherwise is to capitulate to the forces of insurrection.”

Continue reading→

How to Save Your Skin, According to Bankman-Fried and Fauci, by Jeffrey A. Tucker

Jeffrey A. Tucker has performed a miracle. He has taken two stomach-churning people and their skullduggery and made them funny. From Tucker at brownstone.org:

We are being gifted with a series of extremely impressive displays of accountability avoidance. They have been virtuosic acts, ones for the history books. I speak of the strange rhetorical symmetry between Anthony Fauci and Sam Bankman-Fried and their responses under questioning for bad actions that no one denies except themselves.

I’ve watched what feels like a hundred hours of interviews and read transcripts of many more. They are enormously frustrating. They both specialize in justifying the small things while systematically overlooking the big picture for which they are wholly responsible. They speak in a passive voice about mistakes made but bounce off that quickly to fob off the blame for the results on everyone but themselves.

What appears below is a kind of composite of them both. It’s written as farce but an oddly realistic one.

Let’s say that a person named Sam Fauci-Fried has been accused of two crimes: theft of socks from WalMart and forcibly preventing children from attending school.

Here is Sam under questioning.

* * * * *

“Did you or did you not steal socks from WalMart?”

“It’s an excellent question, and thank you for asking it. So, as I think back on the events under consideration here, we need first to understand the circumstances in which there are many pairs of socks, far more than were being sold, and also a genuine opportunity for a broader and frankly more socially aware distribution of foot covering through the community. This is where we and many others in our enterprise got involved.”

Continue reading→

Video: Dr. Atlas Sums Up Fauci’s Legacy Of “Massive Harm”, by Steve Watson

Anthony Fauci is a charlatan and thousands have seriously injured themselves or died following his recommendations. From Steve Watson at summit.news:

‘Fauci used children as shields, created psychological damage and destroyed trust in public health’


Video: Dr. Atlas Sums Up Fauci’s Legacy Of “Massive Harm”

‘Fauci used children as shields, created psychological damage and destroyed trust in public health’

As Anthony Fauci officially ‘retired’ Tuesday, former White House Coronavirus Task Force advisor Dr. Scott Atlas eloquently summarised the legacy Fauci leaves behind, one of “massive harm” to society.

Appearing on Laura Ingraham’s show, Dr. Atlas described Fauci’s as having “presided over the biggest failure in public health history over two different presidential administrations. “

Atlas further charged that Fauci’s policies “were implemented and those policies shifted the burden of this illness from the affluent to the poor, and incurred massive harm on our children, psychological damage, long-lasting damage, an obesity crisis, and we really haven’t seen tip of the iceberg on that damage to children, and again, worse on low income and poor kids.”

Continue reading→