Tag Archives: state and local fiscal stress

What Happens as State and Local Tax Revenues Crater? by Charles Hugh Smith

As state and local government revenues crumble, expect politicians to start reconsidering their draconian restrictions on business and economic activity. Somebody has to pay for all that government! From Charles Hugh Smith at oftwominds.com:

We can anticipate a federal bailout of pension funds and one-time aid to state and local governments, but bailouts won’t repair the eroding foundations of tax revenues.

As we all know, the federal government can “print” money but state, county and city governments cannot. The Treasury can sell bonds to fund deficit spending, and the Federal Reserve can create currency out of thin air to buy the bonds, so federal spending can increase even as tax revenues crash.

State, county and city governments do not have this printing press. Yes, states and counties can sell municipal bonds for infrastructure projects, but they can’t sell bonds to support General Fund (i.e. everyday government services) expenditures.

As a result, massive declines in State, county and local tax revenues are already baked in as sales and payroll taxes drop and capital gains taxes–an essential source of revenues for many states–are set to collapse along with the stock market.

Longer term, the other primary source of tax revenues–property taxes–will fall off a cliff as the commercial real estate bubble and Housing Bubble #2 implode later this year. Lower sales, lower employment and lower profits all undermine the fundamentals of real estate, and the institutionalization of remote work and education will gut demand for commercial space.

Continue reading

They Really, Really Want Your Money by Robert Gore

States have been called the laboratories of democracy. If so, then these laboratories are like Dr. Frankenstein’s, or one of those secret, sinister installations where mad scientists supervised by demented bureaucrats cook up chemical and biological agents that can wipe out humanity. State and local governments are burdened by promises made to their employees they cannot keep. Unlike the federal government, they have no recourse to a money-creating central bank, and cannot, except through accounting legerdemain, run deficits. The states have had a variety of creative, albeit perturbing, responses to fiscal stress. In the future expect them to get even more “imaginative.”

Last week Bloomberg.com hailed an increase in the average state pension funding ratio—the percentage that a pension is funded—from 68.7 to 69.3 percent. The article was more cause for concern than celebration. The increase was the first in six years, after five years of “recovery,” and was propelled by the stock market’s hefty ascent last year. The S&P index is not going to rise nearly thirty percent every year, and pension funds have been using unrealistic return assumptions to guide their contributions (many assume 7 to 8 percent, with high quality long-term bonds, which are a good portion of their investments, yielding less than 4 percent). Ominously, the pension funding ratio is much higher than that for promised medical care. The Pew Charitable Trusts, which have done several studies on states’ funding gaps, puts that ratio at under 5 percent in 2010, and it probably has not improved much since then. The total shortfall is at least $1.38 trillion. Continue reading