Tag Archives: Unemployment

Wall Street Monkeyshines—— Look Ma, No Hands! by David Stockman

David Stockman performs his invaluable monthly service: he dopes out unemployment, using a much better indicator, and adds a critique of the economy in general. From Stockman at davidstockmanscontracorner.com:

The boys and girls on Wall Street are now riding their bikes with no hands and eyes wide shut. That’s the only way to explain Friday’s lunatic buying spree in response to another jobs report that proves exactly nothing about an allegedly resurgent economy.

When the S&P 500 first hit 2130 back in May 2015, reported LTM earnings were $99.25 per share, and that was already down 6.4% from the cyclical high of $106 per share in September 2014. Thus, stocks were being valued at a nosebleed 21.5X in the face of falling earnings.

During the four quarters since then, reported LTM earnings have slumped by a further 12.3% to $87 per share. So that brings the “cap rate” to 24.5X earnings that have shrunk by 18% over the last six quarters. Wee!

You have to use the parenthetical because the casino is not capitalizing anything rational. It’s just drifting higher in daredevil fashion until something big and nasty stops it.

That something would be global deflation and US recession. Both are racing down the pike at accelerating speed.

Needless to say, when these lethal economic forces finally hit home, the puppy pile-up on Wall Street is going to be one bloody mess. But that’s the price you pay when you have destroyed honest price discovery entirely, and have transformed the money and capital markets into robo-machine driven venues of rank speculation.

Janet Yellen and the other 100 clowns who run the world’s central banks, of course, have no clue as to the financial doomsday machine they have enabled. Indeed, they apparently think efficient pricing and allocation of capital doesn’t matter.

After all, their entire modus operandi is to peg the price of money, bonds and the yield curve sharply below market-clearing levels—–so that households and business will borrow and spend more than otherwise.

Likewise, they aim to goose stock prices to ever higher levels. That’s so the top 10% and the top 1%, who own the preponderant share of equities, will feel the wealth(effects) and then spend-up and invest-up a storm.

But the economic gods created market-based price discovery for a reason. It was to insure that in the great arena of financial market supply and demand, the forces of fear and greed would contend on a level playing field. Short-sellers and contrarians heading south were to intercept the lemmings of greed heading north before they reached the edge of the cliff.

Now there is nothing but cliff. Central bankers have euthanized the short-sellers and empowered the lemmings of greed with free money to fund every manner of speculation while gifting them with cheap downside hedging insurance.

There is an awful price to be paid for one-way markets, however. The latter never correct; they crash.

And the suddenness, unexpectedness, and violence of these episodic crashes slam the main street economy with gale force. That confidence shock, in turn, cancels out the gains that the resilient forces of capitalism have eked out since the previous crash, thereby causing trend rates of gain in real output and wealth to fade toward the flat-line and even below.

In short, by enabling the casino to fly blind monetary central planning functions as the enemy of capitalist prosperity. The gambling ethos it implants in the financial markets degrades analysis and dumbs-down incoming economic and financial information to the point of uselessness.

To continue reading: Wall Street Monkeyshines—— Look Ma, No Hands!

 

Job Cuts Pile up, by Wolf Richter

From Wolf Richter at wolfstreet.com:

And it’s reaching far beyond energy.

Turning points in the vast US labor market rarely come with a big drumroll that no one can miss. Instead, they wedge themselves into the rosy scenario bit by bit, here and there, posing contradictions where none are expected. And today, we got one of those contradictions: unemployment claims v. job-cut announcements.

The number of people who applied for unemployment insurance during the week of March 20 to 26 rose by 11,000 to 276,000, the Labor Department reported today. While up, these initial claims are still near the low of 253,000 established on March 5, which had been the lowest level since the late 1960s!

So even at 276,000, initial unemployment claims are still very low by historical standards. Red flags go up when claims jump well above 300,000. Serious fretting begins when claims hit 400,000. That’s a sign that laid-off people can’t find new jobs and are filing for unemployment insurance to tide them over. It’s a sign that layoffs by one company can no longer be absorbed by other companies.

Companies have already started laying off people. The announcements and rumors bubble up on a daily basis. And today, the Challenger Job Cut Report confirms it in a chilling way.

In March, job cuts announced by the largest US-based companies soared 31.7% year-over-year to 48,207. The fourth month in a row of year-over-year increases. Up 40% from March 2014.

Job-cut announcements in the first quarter jumped to 184,920, up 32% from 2015, and up 52% from 2014.

These are not minor increases. And they only include the largest US-based companies that announce layoffs to the media. They do not include smaller companies that might be trimming their payrolls quietly.

In Q1, about 50,000 job-cut announcements, or 27% of the total, were “attributed to falling oil prices,” as the report put it. That includes companies such as manufacturers that supply the oil sector. Last year in Q1, “oil-related” job cuts had reached 47,610, or 34% of the total.

This shows that the oil sector is still shedding jobs manically, but other sectors have now jumped into the fray in significant numbers. As the report put it: This “upward trend outside of the energy sector is somewhat worrisome.”

To continue reading: Job Cuts Pile up

Mineworkers’ protests shake Chinese leaders, by Dikang

Political and social upheaval go hand-in-hand with economic contraction. Things are heating up in China. From Dikang at chinaworker.info:

Thousands of coal miners in the far northeast of China have been on strike for six days, demanding that China’s rulers – the so-called Communist Party dictatorship (CCP) – “give us back our money!”

The protests, captured in dramatic video footage that is banned inside China, have shaken the Chinese regime during the very week when its ceremonial National People’s Congress (NPC) has been meeting in Beijing. A key discussion at the NPC has been about how the regime will cut the workforce in state-owned industries, with widely cited reports of 5-6 million redundancies, equivalent to one in six state sector jobs. The striking mineworkers of Heilongjiang province, a region already devastated by closures and layoffs, have given a courageous and resounding answer to these plans.

The mineworkers’ protests began on Wednesday 9 March in the city of Shuangyashan. Longmay Group, the largest state-owned coal producer in northeastern China, operates 10 mines in Shuangyashan and over 40 across the province as a whole. Last September, Longmay announced 100,000 job cuts – 40 percent of its entire workforce. According to some reports 22,500 redundancies have already been implemented. The company also owes a total of 800 million yuan (US$123 million) in unpaid wages dating from 2014. There have been earlier protests to demand payment of wage arrears by Longmay workers around Heilongjiang, including in the city of Hegang one year ago. The strike in Shuangyashan did not materialise from nowhere in other words, but is akin to a match being dropped into a large pool of gasoline.

“What the Shuangyashan incident has exposed is just a tip of the iceberg. It has been pretty endemic (workers not getting paid),” a rights activist from Heilongjiang told the Voice of America website.

In China, workers do not have their own trade unions. The only legal union organisation is the government-controlled ACFTU, which invariably sides with management against the workers. In the case of Longmay, the ACFTU has been invisible and played no role in supporting the workers’ protests.

To continue reading: Mineworkers’ protests shake Chinese leaders

Minimum Wages Surged In 6 Cities Last Year; Then This Happened, by Jed Graham

From Jed Graham at investors.com:

Hiring at restaurants, hotels and other leisure and hospitality sector venues slowed markedly last year in metro areas that saw big minimum-wage hikes, new Labor Department data show.

Wherever cities implemented big minimum-wage hikes to $10 an hour or more last year, the latest data through December show that job creation downshifted to the slowest pace in at least five years.

Liberals fighting for a dramatic increase in the minimum wage have insisted that there would be a negligible impact on job creation. Though the data are preliminary and overly broad, Washington D.C., Oakland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle and Chicago seem to be finding out that the reality isn’t so benign.

A slowdown in job growth can fly below the radar, at least for those who aren’t seeking low-wage work. But the risk of raising the minimum wage too high became fairly obvious last month, when Wal-Mart (WMT) bolted from Oakland and Los Angeles and scrapped plans for two stores in low-income areas of D.C.

The big shortcoming in the available data for 5 of the 6 cities is that they cover broad metro areas, far beyond the city limits where wage hikes took effect. Still, the uniform result of much slower job growth in the low-wage leisure and hospitality sector, even as the pace of job gains held steady in surrounding areas, sends a pretty powerful signal.

To continue reading: Minimum Wages Surged In 6 Cities Last Year; Then This Happened

 

WalMart Store Closures Leave Elderly Villagers With No Grocery Stores, Pharmacies, by Tyler Durden

Sometimes good intentions have unintended, and negative consequences. The people who fight WalMart openings are generally not the same people (employees and customers) who feel the pain when WalMart closes. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Last week, WalMart doubled down on the wage hike debacle when the world’s largest retailer decided to give everyone a raise in February.

The all-in cost will be around $2.7 billion. While some were surprised at the move, it was easy to see coming. Indeed, we’ve long said that the company’s decision to hike wages for its lowest-paid employees would eventually necessitate similar raises for workers higher up the corporate ladder.

“The wage hierarchy has been distorted and that distortion had nothing to do with merit,” we wrote, back in August. “Higher paid employees don’t understand why everyone under them in the corporate structure suddenly makes more money and if people who are higher up on the corporate ladder don’t receive raises that keep the wage hierarchy proportional, they may simply quit which means that, for Wal-Mart, raising the minimum for the lowest paid workers to just $9/hour will end up costing the company around $1.5 billion if you include the additional raises the company will have to give to higher paid employees in order to retain their ‘talents’ and avoid a mid-level management mutiny.”

Sure enough, that’s exactly what happened – only the cost is far higher than even we anticipated.

The problem is that when your business model revolves around “everyday low prices,” each and every additional penny you give to your employees is a penny that’s not passed on to customers as savings. That’s a problem, given how competitive the discount retail space has become. On top of that, margins are already razor thin and pinching them further has a dramatic impact on profitability as evidenced by the shocking guidance cut WalMart delivered in October.

Initially, the company sought to make up for the money “lost” to the wage hike by squeezing the supply chain. When efforts to extract more savings from vendors weren’t sufficient, WalMart simply fired some folks, first at the home office in Bentonville and then at 269 stores where 16,000 employees learned this month that they no longer have a job.

But the employees at the shuttered stores aren’t the only ones affected by the decision to close hundreds of locations. Also out in the cold are local customers who in some cases will now be forced to effectively commute to the grocery store and pharmacy as the family-owned businesses which used to serve small communities were put out of business when WalMart came to town.

“Though mom-and-pop stores have steadily disappeared across the American landscape over the past three decades as the mega chain methodically expanded, there was at least always a Wal-Mart left behind to replace them,” Bloomberg writes. “Now the Wal-Marts are disappearing, too.”

Bloomberg tells the story of The Town’n Country grocery in Oriental, North Carolina which was “a local fixture” for nearly half a century – until WalMart showed up.

The Town’n Country closed last October after sales collapsed by a third. “They ruined our lives,” Renee Ireland Smith, who ran Town’n Country said. “They came in here with their experiment and ruined us,” she laments, referencing WalMart’s foray into smaller stores called “WalMart Express.” Here’s more:

“I was devastated when I found out. We had a pharmacy and a perfectly satisfactory grocery store. Maybe Wal-Mart sold apples for a nickel less,” said Barb Venturi, mayor pro tem for Oriental, with a population of about 900. “If you take into account what no longer having a grocery store does to property values here, it is a significant impact for us.”

Oriental is hardly alone. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said on Jan. 15 it would be closing all 102 of its smaller Express stores, many in isolated towns, to focus on its supercenters and mid-sized Neighborhood Markets.

That’s a big problem for small towns, often with proportionately large elderly populations. For the older folks of Oriental — a retirement and summer vacation town along the inter-coastal waterway — the next-nearest grocery and pharmacy is a 50-minute round-trip drive.

Towns like Clearwater, Kansas, and Merkel, Texas, are among those hit by Wal-Mart closures. In Godley, Texas, with a population of roughly 1,000, Wal-Mart opened a small store just a year ago. Within months, the only other grocery store in town — Brookshire Brothers, part of an employee-owned regional chain — shut its doors. Now with Wal-Mart gone, the closest full-service grocery store is about a 20-minute drive away.

This is just one more example of why improving the quality of life for poorly paid hourly employees isn’t as simple as implementing across-the-board wage hikes.

To continue reading: WalMart Store Closures Leave Elderly Villagers with No Grocery Stores, Pharmacies

 

 

Hollande’s Socialist Wonderland, by Pater Tenebrarum

From Pater Tenebrarum at acting-man.com:

Everything’s an Emergency

If memory serves, France remains in a state of emergency on account of the terror attack in Paris in last November. As terrible as terror attacks are, they are a statistically insignificant cause of death and injury in developed nations. It is also worth noting that the countries that seem most prone to suffering terror attacks are the ones that are most active in intervening militarily in foreign countries. This is probably no coincidence. Just saying.

We also imagine that a state of emergency is a costly exercise (France’s government immediately exempted itself from meeting the Maastricht deficit target in the wake of the attack, so we can conclude this by inference). Moreover, the recurrence of such attacks shows that ubiquitous snooping on everybody’s digital communications is a wasted effort, if the goal is indeed to keep such attacks from happening (which is doubtful, but that is a topic for another day).

France is in fact one of the world’s top snoopers, but appears to have ignored information and warnings from Turkey’s secret service – information which reportedly was obtained by traditional investigative means and turned out to be correct.

Now there is another emergency, this time an economic one. Mr. Hollande (a.k.a. “the welfare state incarnate”, h/t Gaspard Koenig) has just declared that his government will pull out all stops in terms of labor market intervention, so as finally stop the inexorable rise in French unemployment. His main motive seems to be saving his own job, as Mish notes.

Apparently Hollande made a vague promise that he would step down if unemployment failed to decline this year. Given the persistence of the trend and the inability and/or unwillingness of France’s government to institute meaningful reform, it seemed a slam dunk that it would keep failing to do so.

France’s unemployment rate. If this were a stock, we’d be inclined to buy it on technical grounds

Back when Mr. Hollande’s approval rating fell to the reciprocal of Mr. Putin’s (namely 13%), we briefly gave him the benefit of the doubt, on account of the fact that he evidently had nothing to lose (see “Mission Impossible?”). Nothing much has happened since then – what has happened, was essentially of the too little too late variety.

To continue reading: Hollande’s Socialist Wonderland

Another Phony Payroll Jobs Number , by Paul Craig Roberts

Month after month the Bureau of Labor Statistics announces the employment statistics, and month after month various alternative internet sites thoroughly dismantle them, casting all sorts of reasonable doubt on their veracity. Month after month the mainstream media takes the numbers at face value, even though they will be “officially” revised several time before they’re put to bed. The points and criticisms of the alternative sites are never acknowledged or addressed. From Paul Craig Roberts at paulcraigroberts.org:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics announced today that the US economy created 271,000 jobs in October, a number substantially in excess of the expected 175,000 to 190,000 jobs. The unexpected job gain has dropped the unemployment rate to 5 percent. These two numbers will be the focus of the financial media presstitutes.

What is wrong with these numbers? Just about everything. First of all, 145,000 of the jobs, or 54%, are jobs arbitrarily added to the number by the birth-death model. The birth-death model provides an estimate of the net amount of unreported jobs lost to business closings and the unreported jobs created by new business openings. The model is based on a normally functioning economy unlike the one of the past seven years and thus overestimates the number of jobs from new business and underestimates the losses from closures. If we eliminate the birth-death model’s contribution, new jobs were 126,000.

Next, consider who got the 271,000 reported jobs. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, all of the new jobs plus some—378,000—went to those 55 years of age and older. However, males in the prime working age, 25 to 54 years of age, lost 119,000 jobs. What seems to have happened is that full time jobs were replaced with part time jobs for retirees. Multiple job holders increased by 109,000 in October, an indication that people who lost full time jobs had to take two or more part time jobs in order to make ends meet.

Now assume the 271,000 reported jobs in October is the real number, and not 126,000 or less, where are those jobs? According to the BLS not a single one is in manufacturing. The jobs are in personal services, mainly lowly paid jobs such as retail clerks, ambulatory health care service jobs, temporary help, and waitresses and bartenders.

To continue reading: Another Phony Payroll Jobs Number

Over 5 Million Non-Existent Jobs: How $1.3 Trillion In Student Debt Broke The “Birth/Death Adjustment,” by Tyler Durden

From the lies, damned lies, and statistics department, Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

One of the main reasons why the BLS has been massively overestimating job creation ever since great financial crisis, is due to the well-known birth-death adjustment, aka the CES Net Birth/Death Model, which quantitatively is shown on the chart below, has resulted in the “addition” of some 5.3 million jobs, that don’t actually exist, but are merely modeled by the BLS which continues to assume the same new business creation/destruction dynamics that existed before the crisis.

The is a big problem with this core assumption, which has follow through effects not only for domestic fiscal policy, but also monetary policy (and explains why despite a 5.1% unemployment, there is zero wage growth, thus keeping the Fed pushing the ZIRP accelerator pedal years later), for the simple reason that as of this moment it is dead wrong.

Here is what Gallup CEO, Jim Clifton, wrote several months ago looking at the trends in new business creation and destruction in the US.

We are behind in starting new firms per capita, and this is our single most serious economic problem. Yet it seems like a secret. You never see it mentioned in the media, nor hear from a politician that, for the first time in 35 years, American business deaths now outnumber business births.

The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the total number of new business startups and business closures per year — the birth and death rates of American companies — have crossed for the first time since the measurement began. I am referring to employer businesses, those with one or more employees, the real engines of economic growth. Four hundred thousand new businesses are being born annually nationwide, while 470,000 per year are dying.

As Clifton adds “you may not have seen this graph before” and for good reason: it destroys the most sacred assumptions held by the BLS’ cubicled actuaries and various tenured economists locked up in their ivory towers: namely that the number of US business startups outnumbers the number of failures. This is no longer true!

Here is what the above chart shows: until 2008, startups outpaced business failures by about 100,000 per year. But in the past six years, that number suddenly turned upside down. There has been an underground earthquake. As you read this, we are at minus 70,000 in terms of business survival. The data are very slow coming out of the U.S. Department of Census, via the Small Business Administration, so it lags real time by two years.

Gallup adds that business startups outpaced business failures by about 100,000 per year until 2008. But in the past six years, that number suddenly reversed, and the net number of U.S. startups versus closures is minus 70,000.

To continue reading: How Student Debt Broke The “Birth/Death Adjustment”

Am I Supposed To Be Surprised? by Karl Denninger

From Karl Denninger, on a guest post at theburningplatform.com:

See, I told you so…

A SurveyUSA poll released Friday shows in a hypothetical matchup with Hillary Clinton, Trump is ahead 45% to 40%.

But digging into the racial breakdown of the respondents is revealing. For example, the poll finds 25% of black respondents say they would vote for Trump over Clinton.

How come?

Simple: Who gets screwed the worst by our current illegal invader full employment policy?

Lower-educated and skilled people, of which there is a gross overrepresentation of black individuals.

Get rid of the illegal invaders and the sub-group of our citizen population that would benefit most would be….. BLACKS!

To continue reading: Am I Supposed To Be Surprised?

Happy “$15 Minimum Wage” Labor Day From McDonalds

From Zero Hedge:

Coming to, or rather from, every forced “minimum wage” provider near you. And don’t forget to thank your micromanaging, centrally-planning government.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-07/happy-15-minimum-wage-labor-day-mcdonalds