Tag Archives: Banks

Investor Fears Spike as Italy (and the EU) Inch Closer to Doomsday Scenario, Don Quijones

Italy’s banking system is buried under tons of nonperforming loans and is insolvent. It’s no different than a lot of banking systems, just out in front. From Don Quijones at wolfstreet.com:

Risk of contagion in Italy and far beyond would be huge.

Just how low can Italian bank shares go? That’s the question plaguing the minds of European investors, policy makers, bankers and central bankers. Today the shares of the country’s third largest publicly traded bank, Monte Dei Paschi, plunged 14% to €0.33, their lowest point ever. Two years ago, they ran between €5 and €9.

The reason for the latest plunge was news that the ECB had sent the bank a letter urging it to draw up a plan for tackling its bad-loan burden. The lender is being asked to reduce its load of curdled debt by €10 billion to €14.6 billion by 2018. That’s a big ask even in the best of times, and these are certainly not the best of times for Monte Dei Paschi. According to Bloomberg, its loan loss provisions would represent over 95% of its operating profits.

No bank in Europe has fallen so low, so fast, without completely crashing and burning. On the eve of the global financial crisis, Monte Dei Paschi was worth €15 billion. Now its market cap is just over €1 billion. The only reason it’s still alive today are the multiple taxpayer-funded bailouts it has received, and all they seem to have achieved is to postpone the inevitable (and prolong the taxpayers’ suffering).

Earlier this year, Italy’s government was given the go-ahead to set up a bad bank in which to bury some of Italy’s most toxic financial waste. It was a €5 billion solution to a €360 billion problem, as we warned at the time – far too little, far too late. Last week the EU, in a fit of desperation, authorized the country to use “government guarantees” to create a “precautionary liquidity support program for their banks.” But given that the guarantees are not supposed to be used and do nothing to address the bank’s biggest problem — gaping capital holes — the stunt was pure political theater.

Lo and behold, just four days later, investor fears are once again spiking. This time around, however, Italy won’t be allowed to use taxpayer funds to bail out the bank, thanks to Europe’s new rules that require that stockholders and some bondholders get bailed in first.

“We wrote the rules for the credit system, we cannot change them every two years,” Angela Merkel said last week.

Whether Merkel holds firm to her commitment is a matter of debate. Given that the rest of Italy’s big banks, including its one and only global systemically important financial institution, Unicredit, are in similar straits to Monte Dei Paschi and Italy’s government boasts the third biggest public debt pile in the world (after the U.S. and Japan), there is a very real risk that the country could end up suffering a bank run, if not an outright banking collapse.

To continue reading: Investor Fears Spike as Italy (and the EU) Inch Closer to Doomsday Scenario

How the Fed Saved Main Street, from The Burning Platform

http://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/04/15/how-the-fed-saved-main-street/

Contagion Hits Japanese Banks, Nikkei Plunges, 10-Year Yield Negative for First Time Ever, by Wolf Richter

From Wolf Richter at wolfstreet.com:

A banking crisis radiating out from Europe?

While China, Hong Kong, and some other Asian markets celebrated the lunar New Year and wisely kept their markets closed, all heck is breaking loose in Japan.

The Nikkei had risen 1% on Monday and was down “only” 18.8% from its recent high in June 2015, thus dodging not only the rout of most other markets that day but also the ignominious fate of being pushed, like so many other markets, below the blue line in my infamous Global Bear-Market Progress Report. The blue line indicates a decline of 20% or more. But that was like so yesterday.

Today, the Nikkei plunged 919 points or 5.4%. It’s now down 23.1% from its recent high, in a solid bear market. Fears about global growth coagulated with fears about a banking crisis radiating out from Europe, and particularly its epicenter, Deutsche Bank.

So Japan’s four systemically important megabanks that will not be allowed to implode if at all possible got totally smoked today, and have gotten crushed since their highs last year:

• Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group plunged 8.7%, down 47% from June 2015.
• Mizuho Financial Group plunged 6.2%, down 38% since June 2015.
• Sumitomo Mitsui plunged 6.2%, down 26% since May 2015
• Nomura plunged a juicy 9.1%, down 42% since June 2015

Hedge funds, particularly US hedge funds, that once had plowed into Japanese equities including the banks, hoping that Abenomics would perform miracles, have abandoned the cause. Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, upon the urging of the Bank of Japan, sold its mainstay investment, Japanese Government Bonds, to the Bank of Japan and loaded up with equities instead. This process is now mostly finished, and it too stopped buying equities. Other pension funds did the same. The artificial demand for stocks is dead. Now pension funds are left with stocks that have plunged.

And the megabanks are now trading at less than half the book value of their assets. But this book value of assets, as was learned during the Financial Crisis, can go up in smoke without prior notice.

In the credit rout rippling out from Europe, the costs of insuring Japanese corporate bonds against default surged to the highest level since June 2013, according to Bloomberg. And investors fled from corporate bonds and equities into government debt.

To continue reading: Contagion Hits Japanese Banks, Nikkei Plunges, 10-Year Yield Negative for First Time Ever

Who Gets to Pay for the Italian Banking Crisis? by Don Quijones

From Don Quijones at wolfstreet.com:

Six years after Europe’s sovereign debt crisis began, the Eurozone’s third largest economy, Italy, has finally decided to do what just about every other country has done when facing a full-blown, almost out-of-control banking crisis: to set up a bad bank to hide its worst debt.

It was only a matter of time: in the last six years, Europe’s economies have been drowning in an ever-expanding vitrine of bad debt — and none more so than Italy, where non-performing loans have soared to more than 350 billion euros, a fourfold increase since the end of 2008. At 18%, Italy’s ratio of nonperforming loans is more than four times the European average (and Europe’s banks are in worse shape than America’s). It’s the equivalent of 21% of GDP in a country that boasts Europe’s second highest public debt-to-GDP ratio (130%), just behind Greece, and where the banks hold over 70% of the country’s debt.

To make matters even worse, if Brussels gets its way, Italy’s government will not be able to dip into future taxpayer funds to stop its debt-laden banks from dropping like flies. European law no longer allows that sort of thing. Well, not really. Now, in the wake of new regulations that came into effect at the beginning of this year, collapsing banks in Europe will be “resolved” with the funds of stockholders, bondholders and other investors, including account holders with deposits of more than €100,000 euros — instead of classic bailouts that would raid directly or indirectly the taxpayers of other countries.

It might even make bank creditors realize that investing in a bank is not a risk-free venture.

That’s not to say that the bail-in approach doesn’t have its share of problems – chief among them the “super-priority” status covertly granted to derivative claims in recent international banking regulation. In other words, as the former hedge fund manager Shah Gilani warns in a Money Morning:

If your too-big-to-fail (TBTF) bank is failing because they can’t pay off derivative bets they made, and the government refuses to bail them out, under a mandate titled “Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in Resolution,” approved on Nov. 16, 2014, by the G20’s Financial Stability Board, they can take your deposited money and turn it into shares of equity capital to try and keep your TBTF bank from failing.

There’s also the niggling little fact that Europe’s banks have not yet built up the capital buffers needed to comply with the EU’s new bail-in rules.

To continue reading: Who Gets to Pay for the Italian Banking Crisis?

If This Isn’t The Start Of The Crisis, Imagine How Bad The Real One Will Be, by Simon Black

From Simon Black at sovereignman.com:

Chances are you’ve never heard of William White.

You might have heard of the organization that he used to manage—the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).

The BIS is often called the central bank of central banks; their role is essentially to facilitate international financial transactions among the world’s central banks.

So they are a major component in the international financial system, just like the IMF and World Bank.

William White is a central banker who used to be on the BIS management committee. And this makes him a key member of the global financial establishment.

It’s not too often that central bankers are particularly transparent with the public.

Ben Bernanke famously told the world in July 2005 that there wouldn’t be a nationwide decline in home prices in the United States.

Then just a few months later when home prices did fall, he told Congress that the adverse effects of the housing market were ‘contained’ and wouldn’t affect the broader economy.

He was dead wrong on both accounts. And one of the biggest financial crises in history broke out shortly thereafter.

Central bankers seem to always miss the crisis just around the corner.

That’s pretty scary given that they have the power to dominate and control just about everything in the entire economy.

And despite a serial track record of failure, we’re just supposed to trust them to be smart guys. It’s madness.

A few days ago, however, William White gave an interview stating some things that you never hear coming out of the mouth of a central banker. Ever.

According to White, the global financial system is dangerously unstable.

“The situation is worse than in 2007,” he said, and went on to explain that central banks no longer have the ammunition to fight off a major crisis.

He railed against the mountain of government debt that has accumulated worldwide, saying that “it will be obvious in the next recession that many of these debts will never be serviced or repaid.”

White also suggested that banks, particularly in Europe, will have to be recapitalized on an unimaginable scale.

And due to all the new regulations, it will be depositors who have portions of their accounts confiscated by the state in order to fund the bank bailouts.

To continue reading: Imagine how bad the real crisis is going to be

Italian Banks Hammered; Bad Loans Hit €201 Billion; End of Draghi PUT; Get Out Now! by Mike Mish Shedlock

From Mike Mish Shedlock at davidstockmanscontracorner.com:

Italian Banks Hammered

Things don’t matter until they do. For whatever reason, things in Europe are starting to matter. For example, Bloomberg reports Italian Banks Lead European Decliners on Bad-Loan Concerns.

Italian banks dropped in Milan, leading declines in the European Stoxx 600 Banks Index, reflecting investor concerns about lenders’ levels of bad debt as the European Central Bank seeks to toughen scrutiny of the region’s non-performing loans.

Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, bailed out twice since 2009, slumped 15 percent to 76.6 cents in Milan, a fresh record low. Unione di Banche Italiane SpA fell 7.3 percent, while Banco Popolare SC declined 6.7 percent. Europe’s 46-member Stoxx 600 Banks Index decreased 1.9 percent to the lowest since November 2012, bringing losses this year to 15 percent.

Italian banks’ bad loans reached a record high of 201 billion euros ($219 billion) in November, with record-low interest rates and a struggling economy squeezing profit margins. The ECB’s Single Supervisory Mechanism is seeking additional information about lenders’ non-performing loans in order to tackle bad debt across the region, a spokesman said, confirming a Sunday report by Reuters.

“A task force on non-performing loans is reviewing the situation of institutions with high levels of NPLs and will propose follow-up actions,” the central bank said.

In Italy, the government has been struggling to win approval for a bad bank to help speed up disposals of soured loans. Tensions between the country and the European Commission mounted earlier this month when Juncker publicly questioned Renzi’s criticism over an alleged lack of flexibility.

Italian market regulator Consob imposed a ban on short selling of Monte dei Paschi’s stock for the remainder of Monday’s session through Jan. 19, in an attempt to stabilize shares of the world’s oldest bank, which have dropped about 34 percent this year.

Subordinated and senior bonds in troubled banks including Monte dei Paschi, Banca Popolare di Vicenza and Veneto Banca have slumped to record lows this month. Monte Paschi’s 379 million euros of 5.6 percent junior notes fell more than 10 cents to 71.7 cents on Monday, surpassing the previous record low of November 2011.

To continue reading: Italian Banks Hammered

Bank Investors Fear More Than Oil, by Michael P. Regan

From Michael P. Regan at bloomberg.com:

If you believe the top executives at the biggest U.S. banks, you’d think there wasn’t much to worry about in credit markets outside of the energy space.

For example, on Tuesday morning Bank of America’s chief financial officer, Paul Donofrio, said that he had not seen asset quality change much outside of energy, that credit-card losses were at a “historic low point” and that loan growth should be in the mid-single digits. Last week. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said corporate debt and credit card conditions were as good as they’ve ever been. Beyond energy, the loan portfolio is in “excellent shape,” Citigroup CFO John Gerspach said.

The problem? The market doesn’t seem to believe that the deterioration in credit will remain quarantined. The KBW Bank Index is down 14 percent this year, trading near the lowest level since October 2013. The index of 24 banks has plunged more than 20 percent since it peaked in July at the highest level since the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in 2008. Shares of Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan are all down by double-digit percentages this year.

 

To continue reading: Bank Investors Fear More Than Oil

Exclusive: Dallas Fed Quietly Suspends Energy Mark-To-Market On Default Contagion Fears, by Tyler Durden

It is a sure sign that things are getting dire when banks are permitted to substitute their own valuations for their assets rather than the market’s. If, as Tyler Durden avers, this is what has started to happen in oil patch banking, things are far worse than anyone is letting on with the US oil industry. From Durden at zerohedge.com:

Earlier this week, before first JPM and then Wells Fargo revealed that not all is well when it comes to bank energy loan exposure, a small Tulsa-based lender, BOK Financial, said that its fourth-quarter earnings would miss analysts’ expectations because its loan-loss provisions would be higher than expected as a result of a single unidentified energy-industry borrower. This is what the bank said:

“A single borrower reported steeper than expected production declines and higher lease operating expenses, leading to an impairment on the loan. In addition, as we noted at the start of the commodities downturn in late 2014, we expected credit migration in the energy portfolio throughout the cycle and an increased risk of loss if commodity prices did not recover to a normalized level within one year. As we are now into the second year of the downturn, during the fourth quarter we continued to see credit grade migration and increased impairment in our energy portfolio. The combination of factors necessitated a higher level of provision expense.”

Another bank, this time the far larger Regions Financial, said its fourth-quarter charge-offs jumped $18 million from the prior quarter to $78 million, largely because of problems with a single unspecified energy borrower. More than one-quarter of Regions’ energy loans were classified as “criticized” at the end of the fourth quarter.

It didn’t stop there and and as the WSJ added, “It’s starting to spread” according to William Demchak, chief executive of PNC Financial Services Group Inc. on a conference call after the bank’s earnings were announced. Credit issues from low energy prices are affecting “anybody who was in the game as the oil boom started,” he said. PNC said charge-offs rose in the fourth quarter from the prior quarter but didn’t specify whether that was due to issues in its relatively small $2.6 billion oil-and-gas portfolio.

Then, on Friday, U.S. Bancorp disclosed the specific level of reserves it holds against its $3.2 billion energy portfolio for the first time. “The reason we did that is that oil is under $30” said Andrew Cecere, the bank’s chief operating officer. What else will Bancorp disclose if oil drops below $20… or $10?

It wasn’t just the small or regional banks either: as we first reported, on Thursday JPMorgan did something it hasn’t done in 22 quarter: its net loan loss reserve increased as a result of a jump in energy loss reserves. On the earnings call, Jamie Dimon said that while he is not worried about big oil companies, his bank has started to increase provisions against smaller energy firms.

To continue reading: Dallas Fed Quietly Suspends Mark-To-Market

He Said That? 1/13/16

From Steve Keen (born 1953), Australian-born, Britain-based economist and author:

“…If you look at mainstream economics there are three things you will not find in a mainstream economic model – Banks, Debt, and Money.

How anybody can think they can analyze capital while leaving out Banks, Debt, and Money is a bit to me like an ornithologist trying to work out how a bird flies whilst ignoring that the bird has wings…”

This Is The $3.5 Trillion “Neutron Bomb” That Keeps Kyle Bass Up At Night, by Tyler Durden

From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Earlier today, CNBC invited Kyle Bass, the man who correctly predicted and profited from the subprime collapse, to discuss what he thought was the biggest threat to the global financial system.

Here is the highlight of what he said:

What I think the narrative will swing to by the end of this year if not sooner, is the real issue in China is not simply that profits have peaked. The real issue is the size of their banking system. Do you remember the reason the European countries ended up falling like dominoes during the European crisis was their banking systems became many multiples of their GDP and therefore many, many multiples of their central government revenue. In China, in dollar terms their banking system is almost $35 trillion against a GDP of $10 and their banking system has grown 400% in 8 years with non-performing loans being nonexistent. So what we are going to see next is a credit cycle, and in a credit cycle you see some losses, but if China’s banking system loses 10%, you are going to see them lose $3.5 trillion.

He then puts this number in the context of China’s “massive” foreign reserves:

What’s the magic number in their FX reserve pile today? When you look at banking system assets divided by their foreign exchange reserves, China is 7x, it’s one of the worst in the world. I think people are mypoically focused on a giant number of reserves, of $3 trillion or thereabouts, and no one is really paying attention to the size of the system and what’s about to happen.

Actually that’s not true: we first pointed this out more than 2 years ago, when we showed “How China’s Stunning $15 Trillion In New Liquidity Blew Bernanke’s QE Out Of The Water.”

Here is just the change in the past five years:

You read that right: in the past five years the total assets on US bank books have risen by a paltry $2.1 trillion while over the same period, Chinese bank assets have exploded by an unprecedented $15.4 trillion hitting a gargantuan CNY147 trillion or an epic $24 trillion – some two and a half times the GDP of China!

To continue reading: The $3.5 Trillion “Neutron Bomb”