Tag Archives: Commodity prices

Doug Casey on Global Chaos, Soaring Commodity Prices, and What Happens Next

Blame the politicians for soaring commodity prices. They will surely make it worse. From Doug Casey at internationalman.com:

Commodity Prices

International Man: Commodity prices go through cycles. Where are we in this cycle, and what do you think comes next?

Doug Casey: Commodities, historically, are the worst investment in the world. The price trend of commodities for the last 5,000 years has been down. In neolithic times, a caveman who found a piece of iron meteorite was the equivalent of a billionaire.

Since Day One, commodities have been in a long-term collapse in price relative to the value of human labor. I expect that trend to continue and accelerate with the eventual development of fusion energy and nanotechnology. The cost of most commodities will fall towards the cost of the software it takes to program self-replicating machines to extract them.

From a long-term point of view, commodities have been and remain a terrible buy-and-hold proposition. But within the long-term downtrend, there have been periods when they explode on the upside— almost always because of war or other forms of government action.

The public has been propagandized into thinking that we’re going to run out of commodities. They think we’re going to run out of oil, even as they’ve been taught to hate the companies that produce it. They think global warming will cause worldwide famine. They’re told all the forests will disappear, along with Bambi and his mother, there won’t be clean air to breathe or fresh water to drink. It’s a long litany. I have very few worries in that regard. The future should be and would be unbelievably bright and prosperous if we lived in an unregulated free market world. But it won’t be because the public everywhere wants the State to “step in” and “do something.” Excuse my making such a seemingly radical statement without much explanation; I’ve covered that ground elsewhere in some detail…

Continue reading→

The end of fiat hoving into view… by Alasdair Macleod

Skyrocketing food and energy prices, rising interest rates, crashing financial markets, and economic depression will spell the end of Western fiat currencies. From Alasdair Macleod at goldmoney.com:

Tragic though the situation in Ukraine has become, the real war which started out as financial in character some time ago has now become both financial and about commodities. Putin made a huge mistake invading Ukraine but the West’s reaction by seeking to isolate Russia and its commodity exports from the global marketplace is an even greater one.

Furthermore, with Ukraine being Europe’s breadbasket and a major exporter of fertiliser, this summer will bring acute food shortages, worsened by China having already accumulated the bulk of the world’s grains for its own population. Inflation measured by consumer prices has only just commenced an accelerated rise.

Because they discount falling purchasing power for currencies, rising interest rates, and collapsing bond prices are now inevitable. Being loaded up with bonds and financial assets as collateral, the consequences for the global banking system are so significant that it is virtually impossible to see how it can survive. And if the banking system faces collapse, being unbacked by anything other than rapidly disappearing faith in them fiat currencies will fail as well.

Unforeseen financial and economic consequences

Back in the 1960s, Harold Wilson as an embattled British Prime Minister declared that a week is a long time in politics. Today, we can also comment it is a long time in commodity markets, stock markets, geopolitics, and almost anything else we care to think of. The rapidity of change may not be captured in just seven calendar days, but in recent weeks we have seen the initial pricking of the fiat currency bubble and all that floats with it.

This is turning out to be an extreme financial event. The background to it is unwinding of economic distortions. Through a combination of currency and credit expansion and market suppression, the difference between state-controlled pricing and market reality has never been greater. Zero and negative interest rates, deeply negative real bond yields, and a deliberate policy of artificial wealth creation by fostering a financial asset bubble to divert attention from a deepening economic crisis in recent years have all contributed to the gap between bullish expectations and market reality.

Continue reading→

Crisis Progress Report, by Robert Gore

The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known in this instant, and vice versa.

The above is an English translation of German physicist Werner Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, the chief implication of which is that the position and the velocity of an object cannot be measured exactly, at the same time. One or the other can be measured, but not both simultaneously.

Governments and central banks can control one, but not all variables in a multi-variable system.

The above is American writer Robert Gore’s Command and Control Futility Principle, the chief implication of which is that regardless of what variable or variables a government or its central bank attempts to control, all variables cannot be controlled exactly, at the same time. A corollary of this principle: due to the impossibility of controlling all variables, they will usually lose control of even the variable or variables they have attempted to control. The more they try to control, the less they will ultimately end up controlling.

The principle is playing out; the inability to control all variables is becoming increasingly evident. Total global debt has reached a saturation point, it no longer produces positive economic returns and economies are weakening under the burden of debt service. The reduction in demand and price deflation has hit heavily indebted commodity producers, who must continue to produce as long as their revenues cover cash costs. Commodity prices have crashed although the world economy is saturated with central bank created liquidity.

Commodity producers’ reduction in revenues and lower prices pressure both governments and their central banks. Heavily indebted governments receive less in tax payments, and the deflationary impetus of lower commodity prices increases the real burden of their debt service. Central banks must suppress interest rates and buy governments‘ debts to promote governments’ financing efforts, while trying to increase inflation to reduce the real burden of debt service. However, central bank balance sheets are relatively puny compared to the deflationary potential—now being realized—of the massive debt overhang (total US debt, in all sectors is over $59 trillion, Federal Reserve assets are around $4.4 trillion), so central bank efforts are ineffectual. Governments issue debt and central banks promote it, but they cannot control diminishing marginal returns from debt nor the toll debt service and debt deflation exact on economies.

The Swiss National Bank was trying to keep its currency undervalued by pegging it to the euro. However, that obligated it to buy vast amounts of euros with newly created Swiss francs, and with the European Central Bank actively promoting further euro depreciation through its quantitative easing program, the Swiss bank was looking at potential losses on its euro position that would have wiped out its capital. So it dropped the peg, imposing sometimes ruinous losses on speculators (and mortgagors and their creditors in several Eastern European countries), who had borrowed Swiss francs believing they would never be revalued (the Swiss franc’s value increasing against other currencies). The revaluation will also hurt Swiss exporters. The Swiss controlled their currency’s price against the euro, but could not control the amount of euros on its balance sheet, and its inability to control the latter led to its loss of control of the former.

The governments of the European Union and their central banks have become the Greeks’ primary creditors. Although the stated terms of the debt they hold are controlled by contractual agreement, they cannot control the willingness of the Greeks to repay it, or the value financial markets may assign to it. The recent Greek election signals the average Greek’s unwillingness to continue abiding by the terms of agreements with the IMF, the ECB, and the EU. That unwillingness almost certainly means that there will be a loss on that debt. The recent fall in Greek debt prices indicates that financial markets are anticipating that outcome. Creditors will not exercise control over the apportionment of losses on debt whose terms they thought they controlled.

Regardless of the outcome of negotiations and the ultimate resolution of the Greek debt problem, it is yet another sign of governments’ and central banks’ inability to control all variables. Per the corollary of the Command and Control Futility Principle, the variables they have been unable to control are undermining their ability to control the variables they have heretofore sought to control (e.g. stock prices and performance of their economies). Or to put it in the vernacular acronym: we are reaching the point where TSHTF.

FREEDOM, THE ALTERNATIVE TO COMMAND AND CONTROL

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK