Tag Archives: Global totalitarianism

The Great Reset: Klaus Schwab’s WEF has plans to implement a ‘Carbon Allowance’ that will restrict what you do, buy and eat, by The Exposé

It looks like the “Mark of the Beast” is going to be your carbon footprint. From The Exposé at expose-news.com:

In his 2020  book “THE DENIAL” journalist Ross Clark describes a dystopian future in which everything we buy or do has a carbon (CO2) value and each household or individual has a carbon allowance which is the maximum amount of CO2 they are allowed to use each month.

No household or individual is allowed to exceed their CO2 allowance unless they are part of the elites who, of course, have no restrictions on their CO2 use.

‘THE DENIAL’ was fiction until 14 September 2022 – that’s just a few weeks ago.

On 14 September 2022, Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum published an article titled:

‘My Carbon’: An approach for inclusive and sustainable cities

By David Craig; author of ‘THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS

The World Economic Forum’s article can be split into three main parts –

Part 1 – The elites are amazed how easily we submitted

In the first part, the writers express what could almost be described as amazement at how willingly we submitted to their Project Fear Covid restrictions on our freedom

Continue reading→

Neo-Feudalism: Klaus Schwab, the WEF, and The Great Reset, by James Wesley Rawles

Introducing the faces of evil. From James Wesley Rawles at survivalblog.com:

The topic of this essay might seem a bit tangential to normal SurvivalBlog topics, but as I will explain, it falls into the category of “emerging threats.”

Men have always sought to dominate and forcefully order the lives of others. This is part of human nature. It dates back to before the days of Noah. Early empires sought power and wealth, by conquest. Monarchies and feudalism dominated the Middle Ages in Europe, South Asia, and East Asia. Then, in a consolidation of monarchist power, colonialism was rampant from the 1550s to the 1950s. Only a few large and economically strong colonies broke away from their parent countries, before 1900.

As colonialism began to wane, collectivism started to re-shape the world, mostly after 1916. Ponder the far-reaching effects of these brutal collectivists: the Soviet Union (1917-1991), Nazi Germany (1933-1945), Cambodia (1967-1978), Cuba (1959 to present), and Communist China (1943 to present). In all, these and other dictatorial regimes killed more than 133 million people in the 20th Century, imprisoned hundreds of millions, and placed billions of people under the yoke of contrived collective economic systems, confiscating their wealth and land.

Most of this killing and suffering was at the hands of communists or socialists with grand utopian visions of the future (with special status just for themselves) or a “new world order”. To their way of thinking, this justified taking the lives and property of their countrymen, and often also those in other countries, through invasions.The latest in a long string of socialist despots is coming to the fore. This time it is with the new excuses of “protecting the environment” and preventing or reversing “climate change”. Many of them use the blanket term  “Environmental, Social, and Governance” (ESG) to encapsulate their plans. In effect, they want to control every aspect of human life, all around the world, to fulfill their supranational socialistic goals. These are globalists. As a key enabling tool, they want to implement a global electronic currency, with every transaction tracked. In toto, they have is a bigger plan of action than that of the multi-national Marxist-Leninist communist conspiracy of the 20th century. Most of the 20th Century communists wanted to keep nation-states intact. But the 21st Century globalists want a true world government, with all state and national governments subsumed for “the greater good.” The level of collectivism and redistribution of wealth that they covet is much larger than their Marxist, Leninist, and Maoist predecessors ever attempted. These new “green” socialist schemers want The Whole Enchilada: a reset to global government, with themselves at the top.

Continue reading→

Tyranny in Austria, by Anonymous

This has all been preordained and planned for a very long time. From an anonymous author at lewrockwell.com:

My thinking on all matters relating to the “Fauci virus” and the “Fauci Trojan horse bio-weapon” took a deep dive over the weekend, due to a sequence of recent Austrian government proclamations, one following upon the other, starting with “no more tests” for the “un-vaxxed” which, permissible over the summer months, allowed all the Untermenschen inhabiting this country to frequent restaurants, cafés, health clubs, etc. This followed by “lockdown” for the Untermenschen only, which was then followed by general “lockdown” for all, ensuring the scolding anger of all the holy-vaxxed that the Untermenschen are the cause of this newly instituted misery. Following which a universal vaccine mandate was proclaimed by the idiot parading as “Chancellor” with 1 February 2022 as the cut-off date for one and all to get the death/sick-inducing jab.

Over the weekend, I spent most of the time on the phone, speaking with Austrian friends, Serbian friends, a friend from Chile and long-time friends in the USA. An Austrian friend, also un-vaxxed to-date, played “devil’s advocate” and asked me why I always see everything so “black and white” and why I do not have a more balanced view of this whole “covid” thing?

“Balanced” I asked? What can possibly be meant by a “balanced” view of something like this? What am I to balance here? Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab to be “balanced” with Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Michael Yeadon? Essentially a “balancing” here between “evil” and “good,” no? The word here is “CHOICE” and not (no, never) “BALANCE”. One must of necessity CHOOSE between “good” and “evil” and the idea of BALANCING OUT these two mutually exclusive opposites is, for me at least, amounts to the acceptance of the “evil” into whatever mixture results.

Continue reading→

The Global Police State Is Swiftly Rising, by Brandon Smith

You’d certainly be hard-pressed to find one square mile on the face of this planet where people have become more free in 2020. From Brandon Smith at alt-market.com:

There is always an excuse for the enforcement of totalitarian restrictions on the public. There is always a reason.  And, often these reasons are engineered to sound logical and practical at the time.

In Germany after WWI and into the early 1930s Bolshevik activists and the German Communist Party (KPD) engaged in aggressive economic sabotage, street violence and even assassinations. This along with the Great Depression led to German middle class support for the National Socialist Party and the Third Reich (fascism).  Much of history’s focus is on the horrors of the Nazis, but many people are unaware of the extreme threat of communist revolution in Europe during this era, a threat which was used by the Nazis as a perfect rationale for constructing a police state. Arguably, without the existence of hardline communism, the fascists never would have had the public support needed to rise to power.

In Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution, the Cheka secret police were established in the name of preventing “counter-revolution”. This is an interesting aspect common to communism in particular; they desperately cling to the narrative that THEY are the “revolutionaries”, even when they have all the power. Thus, the revolution never ends because there are always people who disagree with communism. Anyone who refuses to comply with Marxist mandates becomes an imperialist enemy and bogeyman, and is held up as an example of why the revolution must perpetually continue. The police state must exist forever to root out the evil classists lurking in the shadows.

During the 1918 Spanish Flu outbreak, a virus with a much higher death rate among younger Americans compared to today’s coronavirus, major US cities such as New Orleans instituted martial law measures and lockdowns on the economy; closing schools, churches, public transportation, and places of leisure. Of course, despite claims in the wake of Covid, these measures did little to nothing to stop the spread of the virus and the public became frustrated with their inability to function in the day-to-day economy (sound familiar). The population began to rebel against restrictions that were leading to financial decay, and there was little governments could do about it.

Continue reading