Category Archives: Liberty

The Antidote to Tyranny is Liberty, Not Democracy or International Government, by J.B. Shurk

And the way to liberty is by letting today’s dinosaur governments go extinct and establishing much smaller political subdivisions, some of which will be dedicated to liberty. From J.B. Shurk at gatestoneinstitute.org:

  • When presidents and prime ministers make and enforce their own laws under the pretext of “emergency powers,” then citizens should not be surprised when their leaders discover an endless supply of “emergencies” requiring urgent action.
  • The opposite of tyranny is not democracy, but rather liberty and individual rights. Is it not startling, then, that Western leaders extol democracy, yet pay such little homage to personal freedoms?
  • Yet freedom, liberty, and individual rights are rarely mentioned. In their stead, political leaders cherish the “virtues” of democracy and little else. It is as if a linguistic sleight of hand has robbed Western citizens of their most valuable heritage.
  • Is it not strange that Western leaders laud democracy over authoritarianism while simultaneously diminishing the power of their voters and strengthening the authority of foreign institutions [such as the EU, the UN, and the WHO]? Shouldn’t “democratic” nations decide their own fates?
  • Why should bigger, broader forms of international government, however, be seen as more virtuous and less corrupt than their national forms?…. For that matter, had Hitler’s Nazi Party succeeded in conquering all of Europe, would his “European Union” have deserved greater legitimacy than the national governments of Poland, Belgium, or France?
  • When national populations are denied self-determination and personal liberties are treated as privileges, not rights, then tyranny is never far from taking hold.

Continue reading→

Next Up . . ., by Eric Peters

Perhaps the greatest symbol of the Industrial Revolution and the jobs and freedom it created for millions was the personal, affordable automobile. And that’s why the globalists are hell bent on eliminating it. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:

As part of the now-admitted-to plan to force people out of their cars, the cabal behind the puppets who pretend to run the countries of the Western world have double-plus’d the cost of gasoline while at the same time decreasing the purchasing power of the fiat currency people are forced to use to buy it. The idea – also admitted to now and openly (viz, the Buttigieg Thing) being to “nudge” – that is, force – people into electric cars.

Of course, most people cannot afford electric cars – and that’s the real idea behind that. Also now-admitted-to. Private ownership of cars is bad, the cabal tells the puppets to proclaim. So also food – viz, what is going on in the Netherlands and in the process of about-to-go-on in Canada, too. We must walk – and starve – to prevent the “climate” from “changing.”

But absent an outright ban on the non-electric cars still privately owned – which is still more than 97 percent of the cars on the road – other measures (per another one of their puppets, in a different context) will probably be taken to further the “transition” to what is styled “clean” energy – nevermind that there is no sufficient source of that energy, electricity, that can be generated “cleanly” in sufficient quantity to power the replacement of the remaining 97 percent of non-electric cars with electric ones. Which they know already, of course. Which tells us they intend to use electric cars to end the privately owned car as a “thing” for the 97 percent of us.

Continue reading→

Here’s What the Government Should Really Do in the Greater Depression, by Doug Casey

Here’s what governments should do: shrink dramatically and get of the way of people who know what they’re doing. From Doug Casey at internationalman.com:

government intervention

It’s hard to have a conversation today, or even overhear one, without being exposed to moronic – and I now use that word in its colloquial as well as its clinical sense – opinions about what “we” should do.

“We,” of course, is the government. Everyone believes it should “Do Something.” And it is.

But why deal in half-measures?

Why only send everybody a check for $1,200? Why not buy everyone a new Cadillac to get Detroit back to work, a big new house to help builders, and a $10,000 check that must be deposited at a failing bank and then spent at Victoria’s Secret.

A plan like that certainly sounds like more fun than what I’m going to propose. Especially since Americans are going to be a bit short on fun over the next little while.

They used it all up over the last generation.

Continue reading→

Dutch Farmers Intensify Protests, Form Transit Blockades on Roads, Bridges and Ports, Angered by New Energy Mandates and Forced Livestock Reductions, by Sundance

You can’t just screw with people, particularly taking away their livelihoods. From Sundance at theconservativetreehouse.com:

The politicians in Dutch government recently passed sweeping new climate regulations that will result in more than a third of farmers losing their business. The government announced a €25 billion plan to radically reduce the number of livestock in the country in order to curtail emissions.

As the Guardian reports, “A deal to buy out farmers to try to reduce levels of nitrogen pollution in the country had been mooted for some time,and was finally confirmed after the agreement of a new coalition government in the Netherlands earlier this week.” The plan is to reduce farming in the Netherlands, by a “one-third reduction in the numbers of pigs, cows and chickens in the country.”  However, the farmers are fighting back.

The unorganized grass-roots groups have been randomly blocking roads and transportation hubs for the past three days.  They have also been dropping truckloads of manure at the entrances of government businesses.  In a show of solidarity, the fishing industry is now blocking ports.  Additionally, the farmers are starting to block the distribution centers of supermarkets and key roads forming a cauldron where transit is at a standstill.

Continue reading→

Is There Hope for the US? By Jeff Thomas

Liberty in America continues to fade and it’s wise to have a Plan B. From Jeff Thomas at internationalman.com:

Is There Hope for the US

For the entire lives of anyone under the age of seventy-five, the US has been at the top of the heap in almost every way. For decades, it had greater freedom, greater prosperity and higher production than any other country in the world.

America was a cornucopia – the centre for innovation and trends in technology, the arts and social development. And today, many Americans, even if they complain about changes for the worse in their country, come back quickly to say, “This is still the greatest country in the world.” Or, “Everybody is still trying to come here.”

Well, truth be told, neither of these knee-jerk comments is accurate any longer. But even those who have come to that realisation tend to resort to the inevitable fall-back comment: “Well, whattaya gonna do? It’s just as bad everyplace else.”

Continue reading→

The Dutch Farmers’ Protest and the War on Food, by Kit Knightly

I don’t know how farmers in Europe’s number one agricultural exporting nation have been able to put up with this garbage without a revolution. That’s probably what it’s going to take. From Kit Knightly at off-guardian.org:

This week, tens of thousands of farmers have gathered from all across the Netherlands to protest government policies which will reduce the number of livestock in the country by up to a third.

In a typical example of media weasel-wording, the press reports on this all headline something like “Dutch farmers protest emissions targets”, but this is a massive lie by omission.

The government policy being protested is a 25 BILLION Euro investment in “reducing levels of nitrogen pollution” true, but it plans to achieve this by (among other things) “paying some Dutch livestock farmers to relocate or exit the industry”.

In real terms, this ultimately means reducing the number of pigs, chickens and cows by about thirty per cent.

That’s what is being protested here – a deliberately shrinking of the farming sector, impacting the livelihood of thousands of farmers, and the food supply of literally hundreds of millions of people.

Continue reading→

Redefinitions Rebuked, by Eric Peters

We may have to go back to the New Deal to find a Supreme Court ruling that reigned in bureaucratic tyranny, but here we are this week with a ruling that did just that. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:

Oh, the humanity!

Well, if only the Left were merely weepy – as opposed to rabid – whenever it meets with disagreement.

Most especially, official disagreement.

This just happened – on Thursday morning – when one of the last of this session’s Supreme Court decisions was published in the case of West Virginia v. EPA.  It had to do with whether the federal regulatory apparat – specifically, the Environmental Protection Agency (as these apparats are blandly, deceptively styled) is authorized by law to “regulate” the dread inert gas, carbon dioxide, by redefining it.    

Back in 1970 – thanks to Republican President Richard Nixon, who was the same Republican who saddled this country with the precursor of Obamacare via HMOs, a subject for another day – a new apparat/agency was hey, presto’d into existence. It has plagued us, ever since.

In 1970, a new law was passed – at the behest of Republicans (again) who crawl over each other to show Democrats just how much they agree with them –  that endowed the new EPA with mighty (and mightily general) power to “regulate,” among other things, “emissions.” 

Continue reading→

Forever Prisoners, by Andrew P. Napolitano

There is a prisoner at Guantanamo who has been held almost 20 years without being charged. From Andrew P. Napolitano at lewrockwell.com:

“I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.”
— Thomas Jefferson, Jan. 30, 1787

When Thomas Jefferson wrote to his friend, neighbor and colleague, James Madison, his view that the basis of government must be to preserve liberty rather than order, the War of Revolution against Great Britain had been won, the Articles of Confederation were in place and Madison was beginning to prepare for his pivotal role in the drafting of the Constitution.

Jefferson was in Paris, as the U.S. ambassador, and he wrote to express to Madison his view that whatever amendments to the Articles of Confederation he was planning to draft, they should embrace the value of personal liberty as the default position. Madison and others were sent to Philadelphia to craft amendments to the Articles. But Madison had no amendments in mind.

He arrived in the then-capital of the new nation with a draft of a new constitution in his mind and in his notes. The draft would undergo many changes throughout the summer of negotiations in 1787, and the document would eventually receive the support of all delegates and be ratified by the 13 states, without Jefferson’s preferences of liberty over order.

Continue reading→

Declare Your Independence from Tyranny, America, by John W. Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead

A declaration of independence won’t win a war, but it can announce a war worth fighting. From John W. Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead at rutherford.org:

Imagine living in a country where armed soldiers crash through doors to arrest and imprison citizens merely for criticizing government officials.

Imagine that in this very same country, you’re watched all the time, and if you look even a little bit suspicious, the police stop and frisk you or pull you over to search you on the off chance you’re doing something illegal.

Keep in mind that if you have a firearm of any kind (or anything that resembled a firearm) while in this country, it may get you arrested and, in some circumstances, shot by police.

If you’re thinking this sounds like America today, you wouldn’t be far wrong.

However, the scenario described above took place more than 200 years ago, when American colonists suffered under Great Britain’s version of an early police state. It was only when the colonists finally got fed up with being silenced, censored, searched, frisked, threatened, and arrested that they finally revolted against the tyrant’s fetters.

No document better states their grievances than the Declaration of Independence, drafted by Thomas Jefferson.

A document seething with outrage over a government which had betrayed its citizens, the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776, by 56 men who laid everything on the line, pledged it all—“our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor”—because they believed in a radical idea: that all people are created to be free.

Continue reading→