Tag Archives: Mandatory vaccines

Leave Our Kids Alone, by Suzie Halewood

What do any of the politicians and celebrities pimping Covid vaccines for kids know about the risks and dangers of the vaccines? From Suzie Halewood at off-guardian.com:

Softening the electorate up to the prospect of inoculating all children over the age of 12, Secretary of State Control Matt Hancock says he has been ‘closely following the results from the clinical studies from Pfizer showing that the vaccine is safe and effective among children between the ages of 12 and 18’.

While, in the US, Joe Biden appealed to schoolchildren directly to reassure them that the ‘safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine’ which has gone through a ‘rigorous’ and ‘thorough’ review, will prevent them from spreading COVID-19 ‘to their friends, to their siblings, to their parents and to the grandparents’ and encouraging parents to make sure their kids get the shot.

Does a degree in PPE qualify Matt Hancock to indefatigably state the rewards of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine outweigh the risks for children?

Does a Political Science and History degree qualify Biden to state irrefutably that experimental COVID vaccines with no long-term safety data are safe? Could he name a single vaccine ingredient – even with the aid of an auto-cue? Has he even read the FDA report?

Has Prince Harry? Has the Pope?

Continue reading→

Psychotics? Yep – Created And Fed, by Karl Denninger

A post that Joe Blow had an adverse reaction to one of the Covid-19 vaccines would get removed from Facebook, even if its true and verified. From Karl Denninger at market-ticker.org:

Facebook has decided that anything you say there that discourages the use of a vaccine, including especially Covid-19 vaccines, will be removed (and you might get banned) even if its truthful.  For example, you can’t talk about the fact that 95%+ of all associated deaths in VAERS for the last two years have been associated with Covid-19 vaccines, and 99% of them this year are associated with the Covid shots.  This is the truth which you can look up right here on the CDC’s own web page, but if you say it on Facebook – poof.

OSHA said if your employer required the vaccine they owned the results — including the bad results.  That quietly disappeared a day or two ago; you see, workplace injuries do not include things the government wants to happen.  One wonders why this isn’t applied to coal mining, oil drilling and even asbestos abatement; after all, the government does want asbestos out of buildings, right?  So now your employer can injure or even slaughter you so long as the government approves.  Germany didn’t do something like that 80 years or so back, did they?

Incidentally OSHA will likely get attacked on that and lose on a TRO and injunction because under the APA (Administrative Procedures Act) there is a specific process a government agency must use to modify a previous stance, and their previous position was consistent with both law and practice for decades: As an employer if you mandate something as a condition of employment you own the outcome — it’s deemed a workplace injury — if it goes badly.

Continue reading→

Turnabout? by Eric Peters

There will be unremitting pressure for everyone to get vaccinated, and anything bad that happens will automatically be the unvaccinated’s fault. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:

The Undiapered healthy never presented any threat to the Diapered neurotic. You can’t transmit a sickness you haven’t got, after all.

But the now-Undiapered – because “vaccinated” – may prove to be a very real threat to the healthy who want no part of Diapers or “vaccines.”

The first threat may be as phantasmagorical as the “threat” – in the minds of neurotics – of a healthy person showing his face. It is the possibility that the “vaccinated” – placed in air finger quotes to make the point that whatever’s in those needles isn’t a vaccine, as traditionally defined, but rather a symptom suppressor – may have made themselves more susceptible to sickness, in the future.

Some are already getting sick despite having been “vaccinated” against this sickness – which ought to raise questions about what’s in those needles, but never mind.

Like the questions that ought to be raised about the thousands of deaths – so far – of people who allowed themselves to be injected with whatever’s in those needles, including several previously healthy teenagers.

Never mind, again. One cannot persuade the faithful with facts.

Such as the fact that people continue to get sick, after being Needled. Bad enough. But what happens if more of them get sick – and dead – in the months ahead? Not from the Needle, per se. But from other sicknesses they have become more vulnerable to, as as consequence of having been Needled?

Continue reading→

2.4 Million US College Students Face Vaccine Mandate, Immune or Not, by Ivan Pentchoukov

An interesting legal point: if a student gets a vaccine to be able to go to college and the student subsequently has an adverse reaction or dies, is the college liable? From Ivan Pentchoukov at theepochtimes.com:

 
More than 180 college and university campuses across the United States are requiring more than 2.4 million students to produce proof of vaccination against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus to attend in-person classes this fall, regardless of whether the students have acquired immunity to the virus.

The number of schools with a mandate is likely to grow by then, especially if the Food and Drug Administration grants full approval for one or more vaccines in the coming months. None of the schools currently accept acquired immunity as an exemption from the vaccination mandate, even amid evidence that prior infection results in broad and lasting protection from the virus, according to an Epoch Times review of more than 130 university vaccine mandate notices and immunization requirement pages.

Only a handful of the four dozen schools contacted for this article offered direct responses for why infection-conferred immunity isn’t being considered as an exemption. The vast majority responded by referencing their immunization exemption rules, which don’t address acquired immunity. When pressed for an answer, several schools said they couldn’t offer more information, while others said they are still finalizing their policies.

The few that responded pointed to guidance by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which advises people to still be vaccinated because “experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19.”

COVID-19 is the disease caused by the CCP virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus.

“BSU will not be offering exemption based on prior infection,” Dr. Christoper Frazer, executive director of the Wellness Center at Bridgewater State University in Massachusetts, told The Epoch Times.

Continue reading

Covid Vaccine Nonsense, by P. Jerome

The FDA, the CDC, the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies have all said the vaccines neither protect you from getting Covid or from transmitting it. So how can we be forced to get it? From P. Jerome at off-guardian.org:

US-based human rights lawyer breaks down the contradictory claims of “effectiveness”, the incomplete studies and legal minefield of forced use of experimental vaccines

The efforts to require every American to be injected with an experimental vaccine for Covid-19 are based on the false notion that vaccination will protect recipients from becoming infected with SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, or protect them from passing along the infection to other people.

The FDA, the CDC, the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies involved have all stated very clearly that there is no evidence to support this idea.

None of the three experimental Covid-19 vaccines now being distributed in the United States have been demonstrated to protect against infection with or transmission of the virus believed to cause Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2), or even prevent symptoms of Covid-19 disease from developing.

This fact is indisputable, yet media, medical providers, and politicians continue to repeat the lie that vaccination provides “immunity to Covid” and even sources like the Mayo Clinic make irresponsible and unsubstantiated claims that vaccination “might prevent you from getting” or “spreading” Covid-19. The same lies are the basis for President Biden’s hard press for mass vaccination to “make this Independence Day truly special.”

On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it had “issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the third vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),” the Janssen (Johnson&Johnson) Covid-19 vaccine.

This announcement is virtually identical to the EUAs previously issued for Covid-19 vaccines produced by Pfizer-Biontech and Moderna.

Continue reading→

The Great Unvaxxed, by TE Creus

A story from the future that’s hopefully fiction. From TE Creus at off-guardian.org:

The vaccine was a resounding success. Yes, there had been a final death rate of 10% among the vaccinated, but this was mostly among the elderly or the already ill, so it was probably not the vaccine’s fault, and if it was, no one could prove it one way or another, and even if they could, well, the vaccine manufacturers were not liable to lawsuits due to the agreements they had made with the various governments.

In any case, the pandemic had ended, that was for sure.

Of course the masks and the lockdown mandates continued to be enforced; the reason was that while the pandemic had most certainly been defeated, the virus still existed in its natural form somewhere out there, and so it was vital to continue with the safety procedures to avoid any possible resurgence of the disease.

So what? People got used to it, as they had gotten used to so many other things before that. And was wearing a mask in the end much worse than wearing a helmet or a safety belt? Was being forced to stay at home for a few months every year much different than being forced to be at the office working for five days out of the seven in the week? Rules are rules, and those were not as bad as others that had been instituted in the past.

But there was something that worried the authorities. While most people had predictably complied with the mandatory vaccination campaign, there were a few groups that had refused them, alleging religious or health reasons, and found refuge in rural communities living off the grid. They had abandoned the use of mobile and network technology and so could not be traced so easily, and, since non-digital cash had been abolished, they appeared to have returned to a form of commerce based in the exchange of physical goods.

Continue reading→

Fauci Now Says COVID-19 Vaccine May Become Mandatory, by Joseph Mercola

They’ll either make the vaccine mandatory or they’ll make it virtually impossible to get goods and services without it, which amounts to the same thing. From Joseph Mercola at lewrockwell.com:

Will the COVID-19 vaccine become mandatory? That’s a question many are asking these days and, by the looks of it, the answer may well be yes — although as I’ll explain later, I suspect the harms of the vaccine will become so apparent that it’ll kill such efforts before they become widespread.

In a January 1, 2021, Newsweek interview,1 Dr. Anthony Fauci said he was “sure” some institutions and businesses will require employees to be vaccinated, and that it’s “quite possible” the vaccine will be required for overseas travel.

When asked about the possibility of mandating the vaccine on a local level, such as for children attending school, he stated that “Everything will be on the table for discussion.” That said, he pointed out that since “we almost never mandate things federally” — with regard to health — he doesn’t believe a national vaccine mandate will be enacted.

Continue reading→

Fauci Says Mandatory COVID Vaccines Are “On The Table”, Especially For Travel, School, by Tyler Durden

They tell you what they’re going to do. People say, “They wouldn’t do that, would they?” They do it. If Fauci’s talking about mandatory vaccines, take him at his word. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Anthony Fauci is being broadly slammed after admitting to the New York Times that he publicly lowballed his estimate of the Covid-19 herd immunity threshold, but, as Holman Jenkins writes in WSJ, it’s ludicrously late in the day to discover that “messaging” has been going on.

Official lying about things large and small has been a staple of COVID politics: the letters to college students threatening them with arrest if they don’t quarantine, the interstate travel “bans” that were never enforced, the death counts that swept up anybody who died of any cause while infected with COVID.

Only lately has this reality snuck into public rhetoric as leaders in New York, Massachusetts and elsewhere started admitting that their moves are more about “signaling” than any practical effect.

And now, as The Western Journal’s Kipp Jones reports, Fauci is perhaps up to his “signaling” best once again, saying in an interview that the COVID-19 vaccines becoming mandatory in some cases is “on the table” with regard to international travel, or even in some localities to allow a return to in-person learning at schools.

Continue reading→

The Holy Jab, by Eric Peters

You won’t have to take the Holy Jab. You also won’t have to work, travel, or eat if you don’t. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:

The Holy Jab

The Holy Jab is upon us.

More precisely, it is about to be forced upon us. Not by law, probably – that being both harder to do and easier to challenge. Rather, by economic means, via the “private” sector – which has become almost-indistinguishable from the “public” sector, i.e., the government.

Which isn’t accidental.

The whole point of requiring that businesses obtain permission from the government to be in business – i.e., the business license – effectively makes them part of the government without the difficulty (for the government) of legalities. The Gesundheitsfuhrers have not had to bother about passing laws requiring everyone in America join a messianic religious movement – the Sickness Cult – and wear the Holy Vestment. The government merely threatens businesses with the loss of their permission to be in business if they do business with heretics.

This is how the Holy Jab will be administered.

You won’t have to take it. Technically. You just won’t be allowed to live if you don’t.

They won’t actually kill you, probably. But they will kill your life. Your ability to earn a livelihood, for instance – which will become conditional upon receiving the Holy Jab and – if you are a business owner – that you do business only with those who have received the Jab.

Just as a jab (several jabs, actually) is already the condition imposed on young people, if they wish to attend school – including many colleges. Some of these have announced that the Holy Jab will be mandatory.

Just as it will become mandatory in order to be allowed to work, if you work for a McCorporation – which is where most Americans will be McWorking after the Great Reset.

Continue reading→

The Plague Jab, by The Zman

The money sentence: “In the case of the vaccine, there is no reason at all to trust the government.” From the Zman at theburningplatform.com:

In ordinary times in ordinary countries, the prospect of a vaccine for even a nuisance ailment like the Chicken Pox would be welcome news. After all, one measure of society is the technology to improve human health. In a technologically advanced society, members not only live longer, the quality of life is better. An extra 20 years as a feeble old man is not exactly a reward for a life well-lived. Therefore, the promise of a Covid-19 vaccine next year should be welcome news.

As with everything else, it seems, the news of a possible vaccine just reveals how deranged and bizarre life has become in the West. The majority of Americans are highly skeptical of the vaccine. If people were honest, you would find large majorities unwilling to take the vaccine at all. Even in the medical professions, where faith in their own skill is beyond reality, close to half distrust the vaccine. It does not help that the rulers feel the need wrap the vaccine question in their racial madness.

That is the first gate in the vaccine story. Since few people have the knowledge or aptitude to assess the risk involved in a medical treatment, it comes down to how much they trust their doctor, the drug companies and the system. If your doctor has always been prudent and reliable, then you trust his judgement. If your doctor has an unpronounceable name and looks a lot like the guy working at the convenience store, you are less likely to trust his judgement.

Continue reading→